F-5Es/F-20A Had a Shadow Nerf (Bug?). They’re now weaker defensively as of the recent update

Howdy Y’all!

I don’t really post about issues I find in the game often, but this recent change caught my eye and I see it necessary to be brought up. I came across this recent change today when I brought out the aircraft myself and realized the change when it nearly got me killed.


As up the recent update “Hornet’s Sting”, the US F-5E, Taiwanese F-5E, Thai F-5E FCU, Thai F-5T SCU, and US F-20A all had a technical nerf as of recent. Before the update they were all able to have Single-Drop Countermeasures. As if this update, every press of the countermeasures button, whether for use of chaff or flares or even both, results in the deployment of 2 countermeasure drops in total every time.

Originally before this update, every time you released countermeasures, it would only be released one at a time (with the exception of the combination of flares or chaff between large and small caliber countermeasures, as when flares or chaff were used in both they would be deployed together in sets of 2 until one or the other ran out).

Breakdown for Those who Still don’t Understand it (Click to Show)

Pre Update Scenarios:

Screenshot_130
Pressing the Chaff Dispense Button: Drops one large caliber chaff
Pressing the Flare Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber flare
Pressing the Countermeasure Dispense Button: drops one small caliber flare and one large caliber chaff

Screenshot_132
Pressing the Chaff Dispense Button: nothing
Pressing the Flare Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber and one large caliber flare
Pressing the Countermeasure Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber and one large caliber flare
(this is the only thing that stays the same)

Screenshot_131
Pressing the Chaff Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber chaff
Pressing the Flare Dispense Button: Drops one large caliber flare
Pressing the Countermeasure Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber chaff and one large caliber flare

Post “Hornet’s Sting” Update Scenarios:

Screenshot_130
Pressing the Chaff Dispense Button: Drops two large caliber chaff
Pressing the Flare Dispense Button: Drops two small caliber flares
Pressing the Countermeasure Dispense Button: Drops two larger caliber chaff and two small caliber flares

Screenshot_132
Pressing the Chaff Dispense Button: nothing
Pressing the Flare Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber and one large caliber flare
Pressing the Countermeasure Dispense Button: Drops one small caliber and one large caliber flare
(this is the only thing that stays the same)

Screenshot_131
Pressing the Chaff Dispense Button: Drop two small caliber chaff
Pressing the Flare Dispense Button: Drop two large caliber flares
Pressing the Countermeasure Dispense Button: Drops two small caliber chaff and two large caliber flares


This is overall a nerf, it came out of the blue with no bug reports and no warning whatsoever (that I could find). **The F-5E (and friends) went from being able to deploy 45 countermeasures individually, to now 23 deployments max. The F-5C, F-5A, Chinese F-5A, and newer F-5A(G) have a different Countermeasure system (which a certain one shouldn’t even have) which allows for a total dispensing of up to 30 drops of 2 countermeasures. It’s quite different and the F-5E having single drop equalized the differences between the two. As of this update, these changed aircraft are just weaker defensively in this regard due to this completely unsolicited change.

Does anyone know if this has been acknowledged as a bug in any capacity, or mentioned anywhere by gaijin because I can’t find anything on this? Thank you all for the read/your time, and I hope you have a wonderfully blessed day!


(I would also like to mention we have a precedent set by having this same function available for the Thai F-16 which has this same capability as the F-5s even post update. It has 15 large caliber and 30 small caliber countermeasures akin to that of the F-5s here, but it is in fact a different system on a different aircraft yes. It still retains this capability, albeit at a higher BR, and the F-5s with the exact same type and amount of countermeasures should have it as well.)


Please Try Not To:

1: Bring up the incredibly low heat index of the F-5s, I’m aware of them and I heavily disagree with the fact it can one flare an R-73 with the afterburner on. That issue isn’t related to this one, even if it somewhat “balances it out” for the time being until they’re both fixed given their relation to defensive capabilities against IR based AAMs or SAMs. Besides it doesn’t affect the other F-5 variants anyway, only “balances” out half of them if you were to make that argument.
2: Bring up the well known to be overpreforming Flight Model shenanigans by gaijin. I’m aware of this as well, as the current F-5E Flight Model is overpreforming at low speeds, and outperforming the F-20A IRL. It’s absurd, but not the issue this topic is meant to address.

Please stay on topic, I know the F-5 family is controversial based on gaijin’s decisions for them, but let’s try to keep that and bias towards the aircraft out. This thread simply aims to address the issue of it having a lower amount of countermeasure deployment and how it affects its gameplay. I know it’s a tall ask, but please try.


5 Likes

I would also like to take this chance to run a quick poll:

Should this change/nerf/bug be fixed/reverted to its previous state?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Maybe (specify below)
0 voters

(I would also like to say, should it become more apparent if this is indeed a bug, I’ll have the tag changed to include “bug” in it. I’ll also make an attempt to have a bug report created and rectify this issue.)

1 Like

I understand it’s a frustrating issue, but that doesn’t mean it should be nerfed and gimped in another way to make up for gaijin’s shortcomings. Gaijin’s modeling of the heat index of aircraft is… wonky to say the least. The heat and tracking of Heat/IR in this game is based on thrust amounts at a given time from what I understand and certain multipliers. The F-5s reheat being so cold is a problem based on the latter, from what I understand at least, and the former is why harriers have such an awful time flaring missiles especially when turning.

I do politely ask that you don’t bring this specific issue up further, as it was indeed outlined in the original post that it isn’t relevant to this thread dedicated to discussing a different bug entirely (You even quoted it). It’s another issue entirely, even if it’s related to the F-5, that’s not what this thread is about and is considered off-topic as I’ve outlined. The F-5 series and friends have multiple issues, but this thread is only meant to address one of them, the one that recently occurred as of the latest update and the main topic of this thread.

You can hate gaijin’s implementation of the F-5 all you want, but that doesn’t mean it should be artificially nerfed in the wrong way to make up for gaijin’s shortcomings in other areas. The lower amount of countermeasures effects the F-20A as well, which is in no way cancerous in some settings like the F-5E is and didn’t in any way deserve to be affected by this change.

The same bug(?) affects the Q-5s/A-5C too. Previously all of their 18 flares fired individually unless you mixed flares/chaff, now they fire in pairs.

I’m sure this affects other planes that used the same system of 1 flare/chaff per pop unless they were mixed too.

5 Likes

So just gonna add this, the F-5A(G)-40 is incorrect and has been bug reported since it was released. It has different countermeasures to all the Tigers. It has on the left the same CM as all other Tigers so 30 CM, and the right side is a large caliber pod with 15 flares (Large) only. So 15 large first then the left side fires one at a time as it doesn’t have another pod. This should be the only Tiger in game that should fire 1 flare at a time.

(Additionally the F-5A(G)-40 is missing a lot of its armament and its Viking shield CM pods.)

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/5MmIfHiwyMJU

Link to the bug report, if you wanted the info on the pods

1 Like

If it’s wrong, then it should be reported with sources.

1 Like

Harriers should be single mode too lol I do think the F-5 was double fire

1 Like

However, Gaijin should also be the one to give sources when they nerf a plane like that, especially considering this affected multiple planes. This also wasn’t stated in the changelog either.

1 Like

This is the only issue i have. They should have added it, however it doesn’t mean this shouldn’t have had happened.

1 Like

Countermeasure drop patterns are subject to developers designs and balancing (last I checked), not sources stating drop patterns and usage IRL. Its reasons like this in which the same AN/ALE-40 small and larger dispenser found on the Thai F-16A is able to single drop when two small dispensers as seen on other F-16s (even when visually modeled the other way) are able to double drop.

It depends on the aircraft and the amount of countermeasures it carries for gaijin to decide upon its drop patterns last I checked.

And even then:
image

I mean no sources were provided for this change, why should they be provided to revert it? Although this has happened before with other changes, no countermeasure drop patterns have required sources before to my knowledge.

2 Likes

I think they’ve made this change to a lot of airframes. But it may have been an internal bug report done by Devs. I see the argument both for and against listing every single change on the change log. On one hand, it would be nice to see every change, on the other it would be 100s of pages long

As far as I am aware. They are. It could have also been an internal tech mod report. Your best bet is to DM a tech mod and ask an answer for both questions.

Is it a reportable feature or a dev decision?

And

Was it an internal report that resulted in this change?

1 Like

I’ll reach out to one later to ask and confirm this then.

1 Like

Reached out to gunjob a while ago but no response yet. Just letting you know I messaged a Tech Mod. Guess I’ll continue to wait for any confirmation…

They are volunteers and can be quite busy. I guess they get a lot of DMs. Could try someone else. @WaretaGarasu Able to comment on flares release patterns for aircraft?

1 Like