+1
For BP/Event, captured and only tested make better rewards than 90% of them.
1 Like
It’s better to add the Iranian F-5 in USSR tech tree. Anyways +1
1 Like
I would only be in support of this if it also meant the US or Israel could get the captured Mig-21F (Israel would actually be properly justifiable, seeing as they nearly used it in combat and outfitted it with prototype Shafrir IIs for interception duties).
+/- 1, depending on circumstance.
Ain’t no way Japan should ever be on pact side, that should be reserved strictly for pact countries…
+1 would be cool
-1, there’s so many actually russian aircraft not in-game yet, there’s no need for an F-5E to also be added. ESPECIALLY one that had zero modifications done to it, so it can’t even be claimed to be “unique” in any way.
8 Likes
So Sweden can get Kungstiger, t80 and mi28 and it’s okay they tested it, but when it’s Russia it’s a problem
2 Likes
even added as an event vehicle would be awesome.
2 Likes
I was also against these additions. Adding vehicles some country looked at one time opens a whole can of worms, like japanese F-14A and Su-27.
2 Likes
Where did I say I supported those additions? As I said, testing only vehicles should only be added if they fill a gap that can’t be filled in any other way. Still, could be worse. Imagine if they added a captured/borrowed/tested vehicle to one country but didn’t even add a variant to the country that made it. Oh wait…
2 Likes
You may not support them but it doesn’t change the fact that they are still in the game
meanwhile the a-10 with the ability to just walk up to an aircraft and see if its friendly or not, and If not BRRRRRRRRRT
Okay so then why should I support a suggestion that I don’t like? And as I said, it could be much worse. Imagine if they added a British ship to the Soviet tech tree and didn’t give the ship to the British. Oh wait…
3 Likes
And so we don’t want to see MORE of them.
3 Likes
Who said that they’re ok?
1 Like
Don’t remember people complaining much when Sweden got those
1 Like
So what? That doesn’t mean copy paste is good. Soviet F-5E is a bad addition, regardless of if unrelated nation has an unrelated Russian MBT
People definitely complained when they got them. Reasonably so. It was Bologne and a half that Gaijin gave it to them- and people even now are complaining about it. I sure do. I bring up how much I hate copy paste just about every chance I get.
The US shouldn’t get Captured Soviet/German Vehicles, and the USSR shouldn’t get captured German/Western tech. End of Sentence. Period. However, if nations must, and I mean MUST, have other tech, at least make it tech they actually had the capability to operate in a fighting capacity. None of this “well we captured one but we didn’t have any exterior armaments available for it but still we should get it” Horseplay.
I would not sit here and argue for a US Su-27, or T-34, or T-80, etc. etc. The US should have domestically produced or acquired vehicles. ONLY.
6 Likes
Agreed.