why are people so against wacky stuff in other trees? first the matilda now the f5 come on lads
+1 from me tho
I can understand this one haha, I did it for fun to be honest.
I’d love to see more of the lend lease though.
At the end of the day if they did decide to add it, we’d have the MiG-28 finally :D
1 Like
Theres an F5 in the chinese tree so I don’t see the problem with it. I get why the yanks are protective of kit because so much of it was exported but wheres the fun in gatekeeping stuff?
lmao true.
It makes things like Sim an absolute pain.
“mig28” lmao
Unfortunately, the F-14A IRIAF equipped with Russian-made missiles is already in the US aviation. This likely means the Iranian F-5E with R-60s will also end up in the US eventually.
3 Likes
I feel like I missed the opportunity to put MiG-28 in the title.
2 Likes
Both the F5E and F5C have aggressor camos with the Soviet star on it I really don’t see it as a problem
Maybe, but it could be another situation such as the Class 3P, they added it right before adding South Africa to Britain.
If the long term sub tree leaks are anything to go by, who knows.
Consistency isn’t in Gaijin’s dictionary, so it could go either way, who knows?
6 Likes
that is a problem that lays with sim itself. I don’t think vehicles (outside very few exceptions which can only be on the same team) exported or captured into another tree should be playable in sim at all.
no American harriers facing the native harriers in the British tree, no german Churchill or sherman, certainly not phantoms or f104 everywhere and all the T64 family tanks shouldn’t be on opposing teams either
2 Likes
that one was done out of spite, it was the literal update prior to the SA trees addition just to be an ass
I say +1, them sim players made gaijin nerf some models for air rb, so its just fair for them to suffer with more copy pastas in different trees
1 Like
-1 for copy paste
+1 as a skin for the F-5E ingame.
5 Likes
When did they do that?
I had only seen a few pictures and thought it was just US paint for training pilots. I had no idea this was an actual thing. Thanks for the detailed and interesting read!
+1
1 Like
This wasn’t even exported though. You can’t even use that argument with this bs
1 Like
Im also for captured vehicles to appear in tech trees. however only as premiums like how they are in the german tree.
Well, I don’t. It just makes it pointless to play one nation. US and USSR have a ton of domestic options for cold war that are infinitely better than captured vehicles.
1 Like
yes but it adds that little bit of spice while itself being something which can give a nod to a bit of history not so well known about