There is real differences vetween 9E and 9J flare rejection,… those have been datamined, calculated, known and even bug reported.
9P’s, not J’s,… there is also a difference in those
Good thing War Thunder players don’t rate fight.
I had to remind myself how much F-5A bled speed so I test flew my Chinese one, and it’s just as bleedy as T-2.
@Cpt_Bel_V P [specifically P1] is just export J.
Yeah the 9Es of the 5C are indeed very secondary.
Yeah i can sorta see where you were comming from if i take the responses as if they were allways packaged with the plane. Tho that was not very obvious to me at the very least
Unless there are some differences not noted, they are copy-paste based on the statcard and how ive been able to use them.
Idk if there are datamine differences between them, if there are i have not noticed (edit: in gameplay)
From personal experience I’d only want to dogfight a F-5 even a C in a T-2/F-1if the situation favours me.
≠ here you don’t need to put =/= F-5C is a beauty.
ah, i changed it now. hope you like it
1 Like
So, what you’re saying is the F-1 has exactly as much justification to receive flares as the F-5C?
İts almost 2024 and people still talking about whether F-5C’s countermeasure should be removed or not.
Guys accept it, Gaijin will certainly not gonna remove countermeasure system from F-5C, its one of the best selling premium in the game.
Also technically it can mount countermeasure systems so therefore there is no need to argue.
Defeatist mindset helps nobody, but given you have a 60%+ WR with the F-5C over 300+ battles I severely doubt that’s the sort of mindset in play here
As i expected you already checked my service record in order to justify your point by simply using this Logic.
Well too bad that F-5C is compatible with countermeasure systems and you can do nothing about it.
As are a whole lot of aircraft that don’t get them around this tier, and there’s nothing you can do about that.
i mean, if it does. It would probably become 10.7. Same way the F-5C would probably drop if it got them removed.
if it can mount them its good enough justifications for standards set by this game. And idk if people would like a 10.0 F-5C more than the current one. but ignoring that, it having flares on it makes for a good plane to play for top tier newbies
1 Like
Nope.
You mean poor Japanese T2 and F1 planes that you were constantly victimizing?
Too bad Japan didnt give a shit about arming them with flares, but hey keep complaining about F-5C dude.
Honestly, the ramifications of a 10.0 flareless F-5C might just be enough to get Gaijin to actually decompress BRs.
A whole chunk of formerly babied players, suddenly having to play to the same levels as similar flareless aircraft at the BR… Now that’d be a whole lot of loud complaining.
1 Like
“Too bad Japan didn’t give a shit about arming them with flares”
Oh, you mean like the US and the F-5C? Very nice job defeating yourself in an argument, well played.
Edit: And oh, wow, what’s that image above? Why, it’s a T-2! And carrying two AN/ALE-42K ECM pods, already far more justification for it and its brother to receive them than the F-5C :>
5 Likes
Oh Well, if you couldnt understand what i meant in the first place then its your problem, but let me fix it for you.
The differences between those planes and F-5C is that F-5C is compatible with flare systems.
On the other hand there is not a single evidence that proves either T2 or F1 can be equipped with Flare systems.
Looks like bein a one nation main doesnt work for your comprehending buddy, i suggest try other nations.
Read above post by me, cry.
Also, >Implying I main a single nation