It’s only going to get worse; the baseline AIM-9X while a significant improvement over the AIM-9M / AIM-9R kinematically it doesn’t have any advantage over the tranche of 8 & 10" 5th gen missiles.
Too little is known about the AIM-260 so isn’t an option.
APG-77 & APG-81 (APG-85 / TR4 F-35s are a pipe dream) lack gimbals are limited to +/-60 degrees , or +/-80 if charitably interpreted by Gaijin. Stealth will evaporate if external stores are used so all you get is 6/4 +2 missiles at best.
Hi sry to disturbing u again but i found more possibility to mount 3 missiles on the same launcher
its mentioned in the presentation from Marvin group’s and they have collaboration with Lockheed Martin
It seems that Lockheed may have use their product as a part for the upgrade pack sales to Türkiye or the F-21 fighter plans toward India. (even tho both of the plan are cancelled but it does help us to confirmed that the Triple Missile Launcher Adapter (TMLA) or the Multiple Munitions Launcher (MML) from the patent i send to u before and the link i attached below do exist)
I mean, blk2 9x will be pretty good considering its performance in game from a ground-launched platform is like 8 to 10km range. Launched from jet, you can probably get a range of 15 km to 20 km out of it, depending on speed and altitude. It will also be one of the best close dogfighting Fox 2s since it has the highest thrust vectoring angle in the game, according to data mine and paired with loft/data link. Yes, it won’t be the best in terms of range and top speed in the game, but I feel like people are really sleeping on it.
Like…how can the f-16c weigh more than the sufa wtf? I’ve compared the performance of the new f-16 against the sufa, and it’s worse in every single aspect…