Bruh…
Yet another US plane with no NCTR on the MFDs. So annoying.
and we have no reason to belive that EFT, SU-27, or J15 have those dual pylons integrated into the FCS for the missiles they have in game
there are also multiple examples in game of vehicles getting missiles they dont have integration for
so all Im hearing is next update we should get F15EX with 22 mica (because AMBER is more real than the aforementioned pylons already in game)
1 Like
gaijin pulls stuff out of their ass but giving french missiles to usa isnt happening
Or - just make it a direct upgrade to the Block 50 using the GE engine instead of the 52 with the P&W engine, or add the 52 later as a foldered alternative if someone wants an engine with more standard thrust and less afterburner thrust. Cause when you remove the frankenstein nonsense Gaijin is currently trying to pull - the difference between a block 50 and 52 is the engine we see on the current in-game 16C and this one’s engine is the exact difference between the two planes.
[DEV] F-16C Block52 missing AGM-65H/K missile
May get us a chance to have EO seeker mavericks for Blk52
im geniunely curious as to where they stand for additon. ik they are F-16A heavily modernized with IRST and AESA and can apparently carry missiles, also have HMD
How does EO seekers differs from the ones that we have in game?
they can hit LDIRCM helis and cost less sp to spawn
2 Likes
Also a little better TV image but cant operate when it’s dark
1 Like
Hell yeah
Finally
Is that compatible with TER-9A rack btw?
Guess APKWS or Maverick would block the dispensers
I think the single Mavericks (65G) wouldn’t be an issue but it looks like the triple rack the fins block the dispensers.
I’ll report it :)
4 Likes
Most likely the rocket motor efflux would destroy the MAWS sensors on PIDS+
Mavs were initially on specific AGM-65-wired versions of PIDS in other countries.
AFAIK PIDSU being “Universal” was so that it could mount Mavs and GPS-guided munitions (not just dumb and laser bombs), rather than being two separate models of PIDS pylon.
But there’s a lack of specific examples of Maverick on PIDS+
Has it got the proper name of PoBIT now instead of just being called the C Block 52?
Yes
Awesome.
2 Likes
Please also mention the lack of AIM-120D support on PIDS+ pylons. Since PIDS+ is fully compatible with the MIL-STD-1760 standard, it can technically carry any smart munition, including the AIM-120D.