On the RAFAEL official website, you can see an F-15I demonstrating the installation of 8 SPICE250 bombs.
10 Likes
No, it can carry 28 spice 250. (plz i dont want gaijin adding only 8 spice 250 again)
4 Likes
Not same,and It’s better for F-15I to have SPICE250 than not having one at all
Why not the same? Thats the brochure for spice250. The thing is they won’t change to 28 anytime soon once they add 8.
difference between the pdf written and the actual mounted image
Yea I remember I can’t find any image of f-16i carrying 16 spice 250 and f-15I carrying 28 spice 250. I mean gaijin does accept that as a source.
You usually need multiple pictures, or a picture and good acompanying evidence for them to accept.
Also lmao bro its not get 28 Spice 250. I think maybe 16x Spice 250 could be fair as now the Gripen E has the same. But in all reality 8x Spice 250 would be perfectly fine and balanced with the capabilities of other nations, whilst letting Sweden have the advantage for once
The actual maximum intended amount is 28, same as GBU-39s. This is from the manufacturer. 8 was only demonstrated, it can carry much more.
2 Likes
Ah yes, let’s have a random foreign nation have the best kit using bombs they don’t actually use and the nation that created them is left high and dry again
28 is unfair yes, I’m not advocating for it. However as it relates to the thread, 28x spice missing on the F-15I. In the mean time the Sufa can get 16x.
2 Likes
You completely and utterly missed the point bro
Gaijin marked as not a bug the reports of F-16I Sufa carrying 16 spice 250 bombs. Even when Rafael states it, is it too difficult to imagine an F-16 carrying spice bombs in its inner pylons when it can do it with the gbu-39?
1 Like
That was initially, it has since been accepted:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8xuIvuXlfa84
1 Like
Hopefully they can implement it, since Sufa lacks a decent chunk of what made the Gripen so OP.
I’m still annoyed that they haven’t thrown us a single bone this patch, just some minor fixes and a copy paste merkava
oh very good then.
Its crazy how different bug moderators have different policies between them. How many times that thing needed to be posted to be accepted by another moderator.
1 Like
I believe this one was uploaded with the help of a tech mod for it to be passed. Wasn’t a case of who got to it first here
What I mean its that I saw other reports with same issue and using same source, and the report mod marked as not a bug. Like this one:
That guys just blind and missed it lmao