Hi, so first of all I don’t really like to upload stuff so sorry if I put it in the wrong place but I am recently bummed out that Israel doesn’t have a rank 9 aircraft besides planned Greek aircrafts (which I love, no hate towards them).
I know that overall they don’t oparate AESA aircrafts besides the F-35I but recently they finalized a deal to purchase F-15I+ and F-15IA by 2031.
Do you think there is a chance of getting the F-15I+ anytime soon given it’s not too much of a jump or will gaijin only consider adding it once it enters service?
Thanks in advance and remember to be civil and not add politics to this discussion
Now gaijin could go the “Typhoon AESA” route with this, but I find it highly unlikely. More likely is you’ll see Israel getting the Greek air Subtree next update with the Rafale EG. Although I had initially considered the F-16V, it’s a 14.3 worthy aircraft, and wouldn’t provide the tree with what it needs.
Community Manager Smin1080p has already confirmed we will be getting an aircraft next update for the tree at this rank. What it will be is yet to be seen, but it’s highly likely to be a full Greece air line with, if I had to guess, at least 3-4 vehicles.
I probably won’t be able to find it myself, all I know is it was sometimes during the development of this major update or right after it dropped, they said we’d get something next update.
I think with a line with just basics F-84G (C&P), F-84F (C&P) , F-86E(M) (C&P) ,F-104G F-5A A-7E …all C&P . And then F-4E SRA/Mirage F1CG folded , F-16C Block 30 (AIM-7 and 9L config … i have reasons) /M2000EGM folded , F-4E AUP,F-16C Block 50+ (or 52M )/M2000-5MK2 , then 16V and then Rafale EG.
Well in terms of modeling everything is in game already or the differences are very slight (F-4E SRA have different canopy with single piece windshield ,didn’t have TISEO) .
Practically they can change camo’s of existing vehicles and throw it there like tomorrow…
I don’t see them adding a F-15I+ , it’s not in service yet and they already announced they have Greek Sub-tree that supports t9.
And i as i said is too easy to just drop the Greek sub-tree. The modeling is already done. The few internal differences those planes may have (RWR, maybe radar, some weapons) are again easy to implement as the integration is not that much detailed to even see the differences .
Extremely unlikely to be apart of a line. If anything it’ll replace the Israeli-French premium with the Greek version. RF-84F makes more sense.
Not quite fully Copy Paste.
Mirage F1 would be at a lower BR, unlikely to be foldered together.
Didn’t stop them with the Typhoon AESAs, so keep that in mind.
Visual models and research still remain as stated, and aircraft like the AUP would require a bit more attention. Don’t expect more than 5 vehicles at once, I’d expect 4 personally. Easy as their integration may be, as one can see from past subtree additions they don’t copy paste everything at once when it’s not even needed. In one hand it does take resources, even if not as many, and on the other they also want to save these additions for the future so they don’t run out too soon. Keep in mind they also don’t add redundant additions a lot of the time, so most of their F-16s save the block 50s and 72s, are unlikely to appear, as well as their early F-4s, when Israeli counterparts exist.
Ah, yes only some US ones could. Even better. My point was i didn’t want them with AMRAAM. I’d prefer them AIM-9s set-up, lower in BR where it can dogfight .
Ok, more unique… though GJ. I’m trying to keep my expectations realistic. C&P F-84F .
Yes because they got the Italian Mk4 wrong. The Italian CL-13 Mk4 is the same exactly with what Greece had. Both should have 6-3 to be accurate. And both called F-86E(M) as well.
Depends with what BS they will pull with it. If they give it 9P-4 and CMs , they will probably be around the same. If they go by Historical No-CMs and give it just 9Ps (so it will play lower) , it will be like a .10.0 Br yes.
But we talk about Gj…
Also , doesn’t have to be the same BR or even related to be foldered.
But if it goes with the historical set-up, it should be way lower , yes. If not, foldered.
If you ask me what i believe , they’ll push the French first. MF.1CG (Historical set-up or not i don’t know) ,M2000EGM , M2000-5MK2 and Rafale.
MF.1CG visual are …the rails. M2000EGM visually is the same with C , M2K5 Mk2 the difference with F is the radome. Rafale is exactly the same.