lmao
Yep, thank you, corrected.
I just got ability to test flight ex as well and it poses the same mfd bug, so feel free to upvote it too.
already did big cheese
so IAF ordered F-15EX with MAWS, but they’re not getting it, and they didn’t order AIM-120D, but they’re getting it?
Don’t ask too many questions around here
yes
and the 9M/9X and 120Ds on that station also use the same rail
1 Like
I find it incredible how American mains are extremely spoiled.
The presence of AI in the game sparked complaints.
Then there was the situation regarding the maws, even though it was said that both versions (EX and IA) would likely have them.
They cried until Maws was removed.
then came the situation regarding theoretical loadouts.
They whine endlessly, saying that 12 missiles weren’t enough,they wanted between 20 and 22.
They managed to get it increased to 16 missiles purely by whining.
The AI managed to carry 12 RAAMs + 4 Derbys, or 16 Derbys… for some reason, the American “main” thinks the Derby is a good missile, and they begin to cry again
The Derbys didn’t even get the Fox-3 buffs.
The 4x Derby loadout is entirely situational; 12x 120D and 4x 9M make for a much more consistent loadout in 80% of cases.
And they’re going to keep complaining and making a fuss until this is removed.
Oh, and one thing I forgot to mention: the complaining about the fighter jet’s maneuverability.
nothing can satisfy the US main.
1 Like
Where is MAWS?
It can totally fly like a eurofighter bro
you gotta believe me!
3 Likes
“maneuvers kind of like an F-22”
5 Likes
Watch these messages get flagged
3 Likes
why would someone care about you guys making up arguments in your heads?
to their surprise the heavier F-15 with more thrust, flies exactly like a heavier F-15 with more thrust
2 Likes
the only situation aim9m would be more reliable is against multipathing, not sure how you got 80%, the paper jet should have the same limitations as the real one with fox3.
Which was… completely the opposite of the desired outcome? Instead of the IA being in the state it’s going to be delivered, it’s now in some frankenjet form, and the F-15EX is going to receive MAWs in real life in a couple of years and take ages to get it from Gaijin after that.
Except it was already confirmed to be a bug.
The WT playerbase as a whole complains incessantly about everything, but if you’re going to complain about complaining, at least don’t be ridiculous and warp things to fit your narrative. The rest of what you said was correct, don’t dilute your point by taking things out of context.
6 Likes
We have seen these arguments literally being made before.
2 Likes
*IA
And that was because it literally does not exist yet.
That would be the minority of players. Nearly everyone I know and see talking about it would prefer that both get it instead of neither.
The vast majority of people know this is unrealistic because the amber racks that allow it to carry 22 only exist in the form of a patent and a few renders.
Actually it was because of this bug report with a picture of an EX carrying the MRML racks. And also because the bug report to give it to the F-15C GE used documents referring to the EX.
Having an extra 4 fox 3s is better than having an extra 4 fox 2s in the majority of situations. 9Ms are not “80% more consistent”, I would like to know where you get that number from.
They are getting it soon
Or they will make a bug report on it. Which they have, and it has been accepted.
5 Likes
Why write a paragraph the solution is very easy remove the f15ex cancel it’s addition and only add f15IA since America has the golden eagle they don’t need it as much as Israel does obviously because Israel doesn’t even have aim120Ds
Hell they don’t even need it at all only a 17% more thrust and a slight better radar nothing else
1 Like
I can’t tell if this is a joke, it’s not a joke
4 Likes
I’m using the logic of the guy who made a thread complaining about f15IA addition hopefully he sees that lol
Some people act like it’s going to be the end of the world
1 Like