F-15EX Dev Discussion Thread

You want paper for other trees but the US has to be limited to what Boeing says?

If they gave EX 16 AMRAAMs I would personally advocate for it to go to 15.3 or even 15.7

3 Likes

Especially with its current flight performance. Launch 12 A120D at Mach 2 from up high and watch the magic happen.

2 Likes

If you can quote me saying this - go ahead. For now you are acting like a clown

It’s cool to advocate for something that never gonna happen. Gaijin will never place a single aircraft 0.3 or 0.7 br above the rest of the pack. Once we get full 15.3 and 15.7 brackets - sure, give it 16 AMRUMs and put it there

I never said I wouldn’t advocate for other jets like SM2, AESA EFT, and Rafale to go up as well

1 Like

“you like pancakes? oh so you must hate waffles then?”

Ah, my bad for expecting sensible things

1 Like

If they raised max BR to 15.3, AESA EFT and SM2 shouldn’t go up?

huh?

almost the same empty weight , has bigger wing surface , lower wing loading (empty weight) , higher twr , about 10% more thrust.

He’s saying I’m not sensible since if F-15EX got 16 AMRAAM, I think it and the other strongest jets should go up in BR

wing surface is like 5% bigger

Advocating decompression is one thing
Advocating decompression with an agenda to get an aircraft something that you want is another thing

1 Like

dosent matter mig35 has more wing surface than mig29 , (if u calculate it then its empty weight wingloading is lower than mig29’s empty weight value) , produces more thrust than mig29. while f15ex has a much higher wingloading than f15C and F15E , and produces more thrust than them. mig35 is better than mig29 by every metric , thats not the case for f15ex.

wait till they realise the radar is limited to 12 DLs so you can’t even guide all of them , unless this parameter is intenionally changed ofc

really wouldnt matter at all, not like youre trying to guide 16 msls at once

1 Like

Never ran into problems with F-15C GE having 8 DL channels

it has 12 doesnt it?

12 missiles, yes.