Wait wait hold on, this is totally irrelevant.
Introduction into service does not matter otherwise the SU-30MKM would not be getting KH-38s this patch.
8 Likes
im fine with outer pylon but im not sure about 2 more amraams at the spot where the aim154 is at.
we dont even know if the quad rails work irl. or have proof that it does
We dont even know if missiles would work IRL or have proof that they do on the Yak-141 yet we have a totally functional Yak-141 slinging missiles in game.
7 Likes
Scroll back up and count hoss.
1 Like
alright mate lets add dual r77 pylons for every single pylon on su30 and give it 20 missiles cus we have space n it works so why not. lets ignore official manufacturer’s statements. ill even be okay with it if u ask for balancing purpose but u are outright saying it can cus there is space n it may be possible without actual evidence
I think no
3 Likes
You literally do not for the racks that already exist in game, they outright clipped into the engines before gaijin modified the racks ahistorically to fit them.
Stop being incredibly daft and relying exclusively on strawman arguments.
8 Likes
nice so it can be used ? so 12 amraams + 4x ir missiles (if the 12x amraam count is the limit) or even 16x amraams are possible
u are the one using strawman arguments. i clearly said they added it to su27/30 for balancing purpose. i meant to say su35 in the previous message but still.
anyways its a pointless argument as Id_Heaven actually proved it exists
only su27sm, i have proof of it on both su30 and su35 irl
Given the grippen E would only get aim120s your still cooked into the rafale
I am not even going to humor your attempts at gaslighting anymore.
Ahistorically
But you did not, so such is irrelevant.
The racks being present were proven literally in the OP, but keep trying to save face.
idk why gaijin added F15C GE in the first place , they should have skipped to F15EX.
only Id_Heaven actually proved it with the pic. people had this discussion before they added the F15C GE and people were unsure.
Except a picture of a functional MML is in the OP.
Not people, you were unsure and only you. The only other conversation was about the outboard pylons being MIL-STD-1760 wired at all which was already proven long ago as well.
3 Likes
where is this so called functional MRML pic ? oh dont show me showpiece on the F15C
I am not going to repeat myself for a third time.