but not even F15EX can use MRML under the inner pylon. if they add this to F15C GE then it will lead to 16x missiles on F15EX ?. as for the su27sm atleast dual pylons are real and in service with the su35. they mostly added it to su27sm cus it was suffering/struggling.
Are the pylons MIL-STD-1760 rated? Is there a rail that fits them and is also MIL-STD-1760 rated?
Yeah then it works.
Also quick edit, but excuse me what? Have you not even seen the myriad of videos and photos of EXes running around with full loads?
Uhhh, its very well known that the dual pylons as they are now are a total fabrication.
show me a single video or even a pic of f15ex carrying more than 12 amraams.
i can show u pics of dual pylons for r77s being used in active service lol or better a video
1 Like
don’t worry, they’re making it no longer the worst 14.3 by adding an even worse aircraft at the same BR! (the pooper hornet)
2 Likes
not on an Su-30SM or Su-27SM you can’t
1 Like
read what i said
1 Like
cgi/render ?
I’m absolutely ready to see how the F-15C GE gets absolutely disregarded no matter how much we ask them to do something for it.
It’ll become healthier over time to just ask Gaijin to move it down in BR.
what even is your argument
we have seen boeing mount MRML to stations 2 and 8 on an F-15 demonstrator
we have images from boeing showing MRML on stations 2 and 8 on F15-EX
and you are trying to argue that it cannot use them despite us knowing the stations both have the wiring and have more than enough weight capacity
8 Likes
Then you lose control after takeoff and crash
Love how this thing has seen not a single bug fix or balance change outside of 2 visual bugs the pylon from release and the thermal viewer in cockpit this update, its just depressing like just give it 360 RWR and they could say they added EPAWSS its not that hard when all that’s being asked are internal fixes/change’s outside the MRML, EPAWSS or a flight model buff wouldn’t even require visual modelling.
1 Like
US isn’t allowed any 14.3 that isn’t DOA’d by vehicles added a year ago
Not on the SMs you can’t nor with the R-77 or R-77-1 as both sporting grid fins are physically incapable of fitting in that setup under the airframe of the SM.
Hmmm yes, the heavy load pylons that you can cram a GBU-48 onto which is almost 3 times the weight of a AIM-120 would totally throw off the COG and cause a crash. /s
they mounted it on a different plane and it wasnt even in service ? the F15X got cancelled iirc ?
F-15EX cancelled? what are you talking about? do more research before posting this foolishness
3 Likes
that was the proposal for F15C which got cancelled. so we dont know if those are functional MRMLs in the inner pylon.
show me a single pic of F15EX using MRML dont show me a pic of F15C u cant because it does not exist.