actually… it could be!
probably if you can find info about that specific squadron - you can report it as evidence that 15E had them
It’s the pretty shade of gray, I think that’s enough right?
well, i think that worth to try
also maybe argument that USAF F-15C mostly dont use CFTs, especially with bomb holders
Hey what about that yellowish white strip thing on the nose
just need IR APKWS to be test launched now, maybe even the use of the big pods and its perfect
That might actually be a strike eagle
- AN/ALE-58(V) BOL EW Dispenser System, page 3
- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IN-HOUSE RDT&E ACTIVITIES REPORT for Fiscal Year 1998, page 4-8
I’d like more sources before making a bug report.
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/lau-127.htm
F-15E
F-15C
(It’s very rare for the F-15C to have CFTs that have bomb racks, being used mostly for A/A missiles)

391st Fighter Squadron (Bold Tigers) maybe
We can see some clouds in the background. We can call that geoguesser guy to find the afb :)
That’s a very desserty looking sky. Maybe Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada???
The 391st Fighter Squadron operates here together with the F-15Es
Darker paint scheme and the squadron insignia seem to match
??
Seems to be the 366th Fighter Wing

https://www.mountainhome.af.mil/About-MHAFB/Units/
With the 391st fighter squadron
50 Strike Eagles.
When APKWS for the eagle?
Hasn’t even been a week yet lol.
But I don’t think so, you can check on bug report site
Made a report regarding F-15E top speed… which undeperforms
aswell considering that it is OPERATIONAL limit, not that it could theoreticly go…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zdfjZ3IlRdQ0
seems funny
This report isnt correct based on the data i know. For standard day conditions, clear at 40klb, it does 2.32 Mach as its top speed and this gently decreases with further altitude increase.
No document cover, no forward.
ah… yeah forgot to add it
can you reopen it and i will add it now?
Done
added