I don’t give a shit about graphics from wartander, there are real graphics on top. And yes, even with equal fuel with the F-15, it’s still better.
That is from dcs…
Give me graph from IRL manual
You’re either Stupid or blind.
Especially for the stupid, there is a note on what is a measurement in the DCS, and what is a real graph.
especially for you:
Not page from manual/etc.
4 Likes
Before any more documents get posted, It’s on the user to provide declassifacation on the document(s) they’re posting.
1 Like
The supplemental manual that is shown here should be declassified, so there should be no problem
Again it’s on the user to provide proof of it, I or any other Forum staff/CM can re-instate the post if that is provided.
2 Likes
Where in the manual for the Su 27 is the chart for sustained turns ?
Pages 45 and 46 in book 1
1 Like
I couldn’t find it, I guess I’m blind
The original F-15 design used ventral fins to provide sufficient stability, but they were later found to create a great amount of drag and their contribution to stability was minimal if AIM-7 Sparrow missiles were used. The solution was to remove them and increase the vertical surfaces. This sufficiently solved the drag and stability problems but led to later great problems with their durability.
2 Likes
Six Fo, the dirty ho.
Does anybody know if the Flankers really used the dual pylons for the R-77s? Or it is just the same as the AMBER on yhe F-15C ?
only on su-35S…
2 Likes
Mhm. So… on the planes that should be on the level of the F-15EX?
or we should get the fancy racks demonstrated here
3 Likes
welp, theyre real at least
smd posted some documents here about upgrading F-15C closer to F-15EX level