If the upgrades are correct, you can carry 6. But that space is usually reserved for dogfighting missiles since you want to get most of your weight centerline. BVR off the wings is the better take.
Like this one
It’s not clear which if any of the test footage available is from the actual Fakour-90 rather than the AD-40A export offering which lacks the boost stage and is lighter.
For example you have this video which seems like an official video from the Airforce (Nahaja):
The Persian text says: “Testing of Fakour 90 air to air missile”
But then the English text under it says “AD-40A” which is the much lighter sustainer-only export offering version.
It’s not clear if those are even Fakour missiles.
It’s an old photo (might even be from before Fakour was a thing) and early Fakour productions were colored yellow (Likely to fit the desert camo better).
The Aim-54C+ is 13 feet long
The Fakour-90 is listed at 3.96m or 13 feet. Its the same.
Three things actually bother me about this image up front.
-
The nose cone is far more blunt. In general you want to push more for a Secant Ogive than a Tangent one in missile development because its less drag.
-
That conduit on the outside is gross. Absolutely going to effect performance for the worse.
-
Finally, if this is a production missile. It does not have RADAR absorbing paint, which is critical to prevent the missile from being ECMd. When a missile is datalinked and burning through ECM you use coatings and paints to absorb and disrupt the radio waves traveling along the body before they get to the rear antennas (I have simplified this for the forums). This missile doesn’t appear to be built this way, making jamming/disruption attacks easier. That’s like rustoleum flat gloss white spray paint on that thing.
What is your source?
Given that Fakour uses Hawk’s motor and warhead, and Hawk is a 5.03m missile, Fakour is also most likely longer than AIM-54.
But interestingly enough, AD-40A is not only listed as 3.96m but also the diameter is smaller than both Hawk and AIM-54 at 356mm. For comparison MIM-23B’s diameter is 370mm and AIM-54 is 381mm:
You have it on the Hawk too and AFAIK it’s for cable routing.
You can either have that or increase the diameter of the body. I think increasing the diameter will have a bigger impact on the drag …
I can’t find the source but I read that the protrusion on the side is for cable routing but also houses some other important parts maybe an antenna of some sort.
Seems like later productions (AIM-F90-B) use a different paint:
It’s not clear what differences there are between M112 and M190 rocket motors, other than the expanded storage temperature range.
Earlier productions with M112 motor for comparison:
If you have any secret documents regarding radar absorbing paints I can pass it along.
Spoiler
Just joking, just joking
Expanded storage temps indicate a more resistant propellant type is in use, HTPB is likely.
This isn’t conclusive but I’d hazard a guess that it’s a reduced smoke motor matching the performance of the HAWK motor.
I know what its for, which is why I called it a conduit, and it is not necessary anymore. But the way they have mounted the fins, and that conduit are not doing it any favors. A lot of where those parts meet, the alignment, the gaps. The build quality leaves a lot wanting. Even in your own photo, the screws aren’t flush:
What a mess.
The lead aircraft has 4 centerline, just need to confirm its the old Aim-54s or new F-90s.
Those are AIM-54, it’s an old photo.
We know the Aim-54 is 36 inches wide. The body is 15 inches. Making the tail fins 8 inches. We know they copied it. So using this as a guide and the images we have. When doing a comparison its actually really close in length to the original Aim-54.
You can also do a proportion check. In this image its roughly 384 pixels by 345 pixels. Roughly. 1:1.2
Doing the same with an Aim-54 and knowing it is 4m long. You actually get a ratio of roughly the same 1:1.2. From the back to the edge of the leading fin. then from the fin to the tip of the nose.
Knowing that, and the tail fin being 8 inches tall makes both the Aim-54 and F-90 very close in length.
Aim-54:
12.99ft long
14.96 inch body
36 Inch tailfin span.
Given the difference in construction and different diameter, I don’t think we can assume that the tail fins have the same dimensions as on AIM-54.
You could use the picture of the Fakour mounted on the Tomcat and compare length as a ratio to the tomcat’s length between Fakour and Phoenix
Interestingly enough, the diameter of the Improved Orion (M112) is 356mm:
Which matches the diameter of the AD-40A:
So it’s possible that the diameter of the Fakour-90 (without taking that conduit into account) is also 356mm.
@MiG_23M
Iranian SM-1 “clone” (Shalamcheh 2) also uses M112 motor:
And its export version (AD-40) which also uses M112 motor (the picture in the brochure is flipped), also has a diameter of 356mm.
https://mindexcenter.ir/sites/default/files/2022-07/ad40.pdf
2 Likes
Actually, I think you are right.
AD-40A is also using the same motor (but just the sustainer pour) and warhead.
There is little reason why Fakour-90 would be longer than AD-40A.
Especially for the diameter, we see that the warhead and motor are ubiquitous and even Iranian SM-1 “clone” (Shalamcheh 2 / AD-40) uses it, and yet the diameter is still 356mm (same as AD-40A) and same as Improved Orion.
Fakour-90 wrong dimensions:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/62aqRWP8TtYp
1 Like
It sounds like he calls “Fox 1” when he fires