this is a personal thing, and opinions differ.
My standard is a realistic game, and fighting something, that never was in service, isn’t realistic.
Same as the small maps we have for tanks etc.
We all have different goals etc, so accept those and don’t say something is hate or cringe, just bc it would be for you.
1 Like
Isn’t practically nothing known about the fatter though? Except that it’s based on the AIM-9P
1 Like
Your post is using a fake personal definition of “realism”.
Yak-141 is as realistic as F-16, realism has nothing to do with military service.
I guarantee no one loves realism more than I.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
@RycotSS
There’s nothing unrealistic about Ho-229, Arado 234 C-3, XP-50, Swift F7, Kikka, J7W1, VB 10-02, SO8000 Narval, and Yak-141.
The fact your post claims realism is unrealistic is just purely wrong. Learn language.
Was never completed, the variant we have in game is Gaijins imagination of what it may have been had it been completed.
Was never completed, the variant we have in game is Gaijins imagination of what it may have been had it been completed.
Was never completed, it crashed during testing before ever being armed, the variant we have in game is Gaijins imagination of what it may have been had it been completed.
Was only ever armed with bombs, the variant we have in game is Gaijins imagination of what it may have been had it been completed.
Was never armed as Japan surrendered during it’s development, the variant we have in game is Gaijins imagination of what it may have been had it been completed.
Was never armed as the flying prototype was deemed unsatisfactory, the variant we have in game is Gaijins imagination of what it may have been had it been completed.
Do you see the pattern? None of the variants we have in the game is realistic, all of them contain Gaijin making shit up so they can add more vehicles. Calling these made up variants realistic even though they are based on a real prototype is laughable especially for someone who said:
5 Likes
How do you know that Gaijin has made stuff up about those aircraft?
Because not a single one of those vehicles throughout their entire development and history ever became what we have in War Thunder as they got cancelled before ever becoming able to do any sort of combat due to a lack of weaponry (or in the case of the HO-229 V3 a lack of half the airframe). Even if they were following what the engineers had planned to turn them into, they are still mostly fictional in their implementations. The 229 even has the wrong guns IIRC.
Yet even with that they exist in War Thunder with weapons, why? They never had weapons in real life, yet somehow they have them in War Thunder. Who would be the ones to make the decision to give them weapons in a video game decades after they got cancelled? Perhaps the devs so they can add more aircraft (which yes are both unique and cool)?
1 Like
War Thunder players when unfinished prototype: I sleep
War Thunder players when unfinished prototype but Russian: real shit?
5 Likes
7 Likes
If you don’t like this plane, I suggest moving it to the USSR tech tree.
This is the same person who thinks there was no double standard when they justified not giving the brimstones its full capabilities (because it would be OP) while also allowing the KH38s in the game.
He argues for the sake of arguing.
4 Likes
Honestly I’m fine with this however they need to explicitly state that this is not historically accurate and is done for balancing, or whatever.
I don’t know how and what they will do, i just started playing that version of the plane. I know one thing. You can’t uptier it to 13.0 without proper IR… and i dgaf about they guys that can’t def against F90s. Because if i die to F90s or AIM-54s…or even AMRAAMs, it’s my fault entirely , not even then skills of the other player because he just pushed a keybind -fullstop- .
They should try that approach instead of cry about OP this OP that.
From the games i’ve played my major problem that won’t go away even with F90s or whatever missile…are 9Ps. They just can’t in that BR range. So Fatter it is…like tomorrow.
2 Likes
The main problem with it going to 13.0 isnt really the ir missiles, its the terrible rwr, bad radar and only 30 cm pops. You have no ability to properly counter any aim-120s or any other active radar missile for that matter, all your radar missiles are easily countered by just going cold and dropping chaff since your radar is head on only, while you have to somehow notch (without having any idea whats going on because of your terrible rwr) and also dumb all your chaff to evade just one missile. Also to defeat a single irccm missile you probably need to dump all the flares you have since you engines run super hot.
1 Like
I don’t know.
What i know is without proper IR it doesn’t help the situation. And so far i know that i would have 2x the kills i have if i had AIM-9M/Magic II or R73 or even AIM-9L or Python 3. I can go into position but 9Ps can’t make the kills. That’s my problem so far. And i don’t have F90 or even CMs mod yet. And in every uptier (90%) of the games i have planes with ARH in it… it doesn’t bother me even if RWR is trash. I don’t mind going down with 2/1 K/D in a match. I start to get annoyed from the times it should have happened but 9P just won’t cut it.
And in that BR everything at least got something you can work with…instead that plane’s success is based on how bad are others and not defend against F90. Which will happen even if it gets uptiered , but it’s not something that’s actually data for comparison in a plane’s strength…
the iriaf never got aim9ls, fatter or r73s, it only used aim9ps
you sound like “just notch bro” guy, dodging fakours at alt is EXTREMELY hard, you get rwr warning for like 5 seconds and you die, if you get into a notch the iog will keep locking onto you, after the iog buff to fox3s its even HARDER to dodge them, trying to multipath them is also hard because they will just splash you, you cant go cold against them it will just kill you anyway, so yeah they are OP
Did you see me anywhere saying IRIAF getting AIM-9L?I said if i have any of those i would have two times the kills i have with the plane (which i started grinding yesterday from stock).
Fatter is practically an all-aspect AIM-9P , airborne derivative of Azarakhsh missile that is use by the SHORAD with the same name. IRIAF Phantoms use it as well , Saeqeh and Azarakhsh use it as well and also drones. Possibly is the missile you see in most newer pictures of those planes , and have in mind that AIM-9P and 7E2 from the 70s have expired by now (yes, chemistry doesn’t care about a lot of things and RNZAF had an incident with their AIM-9Gs, warheads from those sidewinders at least expired after 15 years i think).
Even the 7E2 you see in those pictures is an Iranian reverse engineered one , and we don’t even know if something is changed in the specs of the missile.
R-73s they do have though and the test was successful, R-27 wasn’t successful. Though they don’t give it to Tomcats because they are in high demand from all the other Russian types they have. Tomcats are secondary for Iran nowdays.
Maybe i sound like that, because in my plays with MF.1C-200, M2K even F-14A and IRIAF or F-16s , Kfir C.7 etc. …over 500 games the last month… i’ve died…10 times to F90. Oh, keyword -Altitude. You know F-14s are in there, you know the missile is very strong at altitude. Why are you there ? To “just notch bro” ? Then it’s all you. Stay low , mask , etc.
I understand they create boring gameplay and it gets repetitive and annoying , but saying the missile is OP because we play things wrong (me included) is too much, really. It’s not that we are flawless in every play… none of us.
1 Like