F-14 Tomcat: History, Performance & Discussion

Right now, the AIM-7P is a bit of a lost cause unless we find new sources with additional information. However, we could instead ask for the AIM-7MH and distinguish it from the AIM-7M through the incorporation of lofting capability.

That would give the F-14D, and possibly the F-14B, the following options:

  • AIM-7M (without lofting capability)
  • AIM-7MH (with lofting capability)

That said, I’ve heard that the in-game AIM-7M already has lofting capability, so that might need to be changed.

As for the AIM-54C+, unfortunately, it would end up being another copy-and-paste AIM-54C with identical in-game performance but a different name. Gaijin really needs to focus on implementing the outstanding AIM-54C bug reports, such as correcting the reduced motor performance and other known issues.

2 Likes

Someone found evidence F-14D used 7P for training exercises, and I’d question why they would use it if the main function didn’t work with AN/APG-71…

Ik… they won’t accept it unless we get new sources proving the AN/APG-71 can provide its datalink.

Link-16 should be compatible and that’s what AN/APG-71 uses, I don’t know why the bug report mods felt the need to straight-up lie.

Either way, still more realistic than the F-14A IRIAF using R-27R1s.

1 Like

Blue is probably VF-213 Black Lions CAG bird?

Tomcats one must be VF-31 Tomcatters.

Seems We don’t gets Red Rippers and Gunfighters skin this time :/

2 Likes

“Accepted” doesn’t mean anything yet; the F-104G/S was “accepted” based on reports proving it had IRST and EEGS two years ago, and it still doesn’t have those capabilities.

6 Likes

this thing for sure.

It’s only a small fix. They will copy and paste the same AIM-54C with its in-game values and give it a new name. That’s it.

They won’t give its ECCM functions, of course.

2 Likes

Seems they messed up F-14Bs model ahahahaha

ECM blisters on the glove section is gone for somehow

5 Likes

There it is! But surely, the navy would definitely use the AIM-7P on F-14D despite (according to Gaijin) the core feature of the 7P not being compatible with the F-14D…
image

7 Likes

AN/APG-71 can use DL. And its have a Link16. I dont know why they think it cant DL.

6 Likes

It’s crazy, they legitimately try to gaslight players…

2 Likes

Isn’t it relevant to AWACS and smt, not weapon stuffs?

Its show F-14D can DL together just like that DL AIM-120 in F-15. Its mean Two F-14D can operate together with DL.

1 Like

Just like this.

The official announcement has already been updated and now includes “9M” in the description, so it’s almost—ALMOST—a Super Tomcat.

We’re still waiting for the AIM-7P and AIM-54C+, and then it will be a full-fledged SUPER Tomcat.

In an ideal world, the F-14A would now be equipped with the AIM-9L, which it definitely used in the real world :)

P.S.: Of course, it would be nice to see the TT version F-14D, not just the one hidden behind a paywall.

5 Likes

my report finally acted on after over a year
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ludaFAmzJOwi

3 Likes

Its been a long my friends now its came true!!!

They got it done pretty quickly; the F-104G/S has been waiting over two years for the IRST/EEGS, which have already been “accepted.”

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TA3Omz0Zuqgs
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wlETGoDDwzUn

The F-104G/S suffer from having a very high BR relative to their combat capabilities, yet they don’t yet possess the full capabilities they actually had. EEGS and IRST would be a nice addition, and the funniest part is that the F-104S/G in the game have an IRST module modeled in, but well, two years isn’t enough time to “enable” it.

1 Like

We have gone from “absolutely unexpected worse case scenario” to “oh god they did the bare minimum this is worse case scenario”

Thanks for adding the Aim-9M at least. I’ll give credit there.

6 Likes