F-14 Tomcat: History, Performance & Discussion

They do care about their products selling and based on some information the sales might not be high on this.

With the decrease of F-14s it might be unclassified now.

Unfortunately, that’s not really how it works. Even if the Iranian F-14 fleet is gone overnight, it won’t speed up FOIA.

They could still have legitimate security concerns to safeguard their APG-71 and IRST technology.

1 Like

True it won’t be that fast but the need to hide info is not as prevalent. Also got the Maverick act going through so the documentation is going to being reviewed this could be the year of the cat.

It’s still a stretch by anymeans though. And FOIA is a slow burn.

Unfortunately, as expected, this bug report was turned down, but we were provided with detailed reasoning.

No, you are twisting the words. OP specifically said that people deserve to be farmed for buying F-14D.

Then go make a bug report. Just keep in mind that it can easily warrant 13.3 br placement. F-16 ADF flies with 9L at 13.3 just because it has AMRAAM

I love how operationally it matters for this aircraft, then you have jets flying around with missiles they never had.

Like R-27R1s on the F-14A IRIAF…

1 Like

That’s 1 on a list.

1 Like

Another submission of a bug report for AIM-54C+

[DEV] F-14D’s AIM-54C should be changed to AIM-54C+

Edit: It’s accepted ;)

5 Likes

Just when I hit “I have the same issue” it got accepted. This might give a decent buff to F-14D and maybe even F-14B if gaijin want to keep both equal

I love that there is a document literally stating the 7P but week keep getting a Bug report manager who just stops it.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PBtBf7H6QEE9
@Gunjob could you do something about this ticket?
but nice win on the C+

3 Likes

yeah that volunteer 1 isnt very good

1 Like

They should get aim9m/aim9Li too

Then. Go. And. Make. A. Bug. Report.

You know what i love?
That for HARM , for example , that yes it wasn’t certified for the plane they give you 30 cources.
But for the other things that were legit and valid and certified and people provide info , they just say no and close the topic.
LAUGHABLE.

Which is already 13,3 and at the very least could give it Fatter missile instead of R27 it didn’t use.
I mean , they implemented F90 with azzpull stats from wiki and claims… but they can’t implement “safely” (nerfed from what the claims state) practically a 9P-5? In my thought i only give it IRCCM from the claims, not the range or G overload , i practically nerf it. At 13,3?

it’s not like you need to bring any 9L’s when you can have 6x amraams instead on the ADF

1 Like

That is true, but the point being is that there are aircrafts that don’t feature IRCCM fox-2s above 12.7.