F-111F and F-111C same BR yet diffrent loadouts

I’m just wondering if the F-111C should be a lower BR than the F-111F as it has less power and 2 less missiles and doesn’t get access to AGM-65?

1 Like

I have write a report on it
F111C should be provided with GBU-15 and AGM-142 // Gaijin.net // Issues

1 Like

more flares…

3 Likes

by the way f111c is almost same trust compired with f111a in air RB,so i think its air rb should go to 11.0 consider 4 9L ,its current br is much much too high

if anything it should’ve been squadron for us tree to go along with AIM

1 Like

One is on the British TT the other the US TT. Britain always has nerfs and/or a higher BR. Just look at the Tornado Gr1. It is the only Tornado IDS with the Mk101 engine for “balancing reasons” even though Britain did use the Mk103 engines on the Tornado Gr1. Even the “early” Tornado IDSs in the form of the A200 and WTD61 still use the Mk103 engines

The F-111F is potentially meant to have the same number of CMs

2 Likes

i think the agm142 should be given to f-111c consider its currect terrible performence

Its also supersonic…

Sea Harrier FRS1 with 4x Aim-9Ls is currently 11.3 (but should be 11.0)
AV-8B (NA) with 4x Aim-9L is 11.3
Tornado IDS (early) with 2x Aim-9L are 11.3
Tornado IDS with 2x Aim-9L are 11.7

There is no way the F-111C would be 11.0

2 Likes

Potentially

even only carried with 4 aim9l its speed up performance is much much teribble then Tornado

and i can tell you that it is slow than a10a when take off with 12*500bl bombs

The tf30-p103 engine on the f111c should have a lot more thrust. It current has the same stats as the f111a so it probably will be changed ( hopefully)

by the way its current trust (about 4300kg to 7500kg in currect game)is smaller than it should be (TF30-P-103
Redesignated -3 upgraded with -100 components under the Pacer 30 program, 9,800 lbf (43.59 kN) thrust, 18,500 lbf (82.29 kN) with afterburner. )
TF30-P-109
Redesignated -9 upgraded with -100 components under the Pacer 30 program, 20,840 lbf (92.70 kN) thrust with afterburner.
TF30-P-109RA
Redesignated -109 when in RAAF service, powered the F-111C.

Wiki: TF30-P-103. Redesignated -3 upgraded with -100 components under the Pacer 30 program, 9,800 lbf (43.59 kN) thrust, 18,500 lbf (82.29 kN) with afterburner .

Take off is somewhat irrelevant, part of the issue is the sheer amount of fuel you have to haul.

F-111C (stock, not unlocked it yet) at 1000ft, min fuel, 60mins (constant) 2x Aim-9L (all I can test at the moment) + Guns:

Max speed: Mach 1.24
half decent handling, (but much higher energy bleed)
MAWS
240 CMs.
Acceleration feels comprable to the Tornado IDS

Tornado Gr1 (spaded) at 1000ft, max fuel, 60 mins (constant), 2x Aim-9L, 2x BOZ

Max Speed: Mach 1.15
half decent handling (since dev server buff)
Better RWR
Less flares but more chaff
Better low speed acceleration but comprable high speed acceleration

The potential for the F-111C to abuse downtiers, even at 11.3 is too great and its a interdictor anyway, its main focus should be dropping bombs on bases and that is something its going to do really well, maybe even better than the Tornado IDS in some respects

1 Like

i report on its trust, but come with not a bag…

no, you can’t image how slow it was at now,it will take at least double times to reach the bases than tornado with only 10 500bl bombs

its currect performace is so terrible that unable to play at all

It cant go any lower in BR. Its as low as it can go with AIm-9L

The Devs mentioned multiple times that a lot things in the dev server are just place holders and none of the BRs are final