Here before the “muh F-111C belong in USA” comes
Edit: The guy above me edited his message lmfao, used to say “bomba” lmaooo
36 Likes
UK DOESNT NEED IT !!!1!!!11!1!
Spoiler
complete sentence
2 Likes
Both should have 9Ms, and only 4 9L/M
“CATM/AIM-9L/M not authorized for carriage on stations 3A or 6A”, the side pylons are limited to older AIM-9 types.
Plus AIM-9J/J-1 (P, because no radar doesn’t matter)/P-4 for the F
Anyone know about 9Ps for the C?
13 Likes
(Apparently the 111F had same amt of flares but it’s like 56 cm in-game)
2 Likes
We should get AGM-142 and AGM-130 with this planes.
2 Likes
No they shouldn’t. Stop trying to nerf US aircraft with bad BRs.
Just play the American tech tree yourself instead of trying to nerf your opponents.
F-111F is already going to be one of the best 11.7 fighters in the game, even better than Mig-23ML.
It doesn’t need to move to 12.7+ with 9Ms.
@quartas121
They have to change its 3D model as well for the new flares.
AGM 142 would be way more unbalanced than AGM 130, only 130 should come
Idk about that, they’re pretty similar. Plus, the 111F can carry 4 130s while the C can only carry 2 142s (or maybe 3 though only 2 operationally) because of the need for an external guidance pod.
1 Like
He edited it lmao
7 Likes
If you are smoking something to come up with these takes, please share it with us too my friend. I’d like to forget reality as well.
10 Likes
The AN/AXQ-14 or AN/ZSW-1 Data link pod goes on its own station at the back.
3 Likes
Lmao I love trolls
Shameless plug to remain on topic
4 Likes
@hinjanattori
16 degrees per second sustained turn rate with 5700kg of fuel for F-111F.
10,000kgf engines static, 14,800kgf at speed.
F-14A’s sustained turn rate is 16.7 degrees per second with 5000kg of fuel.
Both clean. You add AIM-7s to the F-14A and it’ll be closer to the F-111F than further apart.
Vark:
F-14A:
Yeah lol
1 Like
That’s fair
Lmao
Can’t wait for the RAAF Hornet with ASRAAM :)
Nah, kiwi Skyhawks