Idk about that, they’re pretty similar. Plus, the 111F can carry 4 130s while the C can only carry 2 142s (or maybe 3 though only 2 operationally) because of the need for an external guidance pod.
1 Like
He edited it lmao
7 Likes
If you are smoking something to come up with these takes, please share it with us too my friend. I’d like to forget reality as well.
10 Likes
The AN/AXQ-14 or AN/ZSW-1 Data link pod goes on its own station at the back.
3 Likes
Lmao I love trolls
Shameless plug to remain on topic
4 Likes
@hinjanattori
16 degrees per second sustained turn rate with 5700kg of fuel for F-111F.
10,000kgf engines static, 14,800kgf at speed.
F-14A’s sustained turn rate is 16.7 degrees per second with 5000kg of fuel.
Both clean. You add AIM-7s to the F-14A and it’ll be closer to the F-111F than further apart.
Vark:
F-14A:
Yeah lol
1 Like
That’s fair
Lmao
Can’t wait for the RAAF Hornet with ASRAAM :)
Nah, kiwi Skyhawks
Probably not discrimination
Just lack of communication internally
I would also like to reiterate my extreme disappointment at Gaijin skipping a whole generation of aircraft, the F-111E, F-111C pre-AUP, and Su-24 in favour of the F-111F, F-111C AUP, and Su-24M. Please stop skipping aircraft just because later ones are more hype!
1 Like
Have you considered that, it’s on the Dev server and so does not necessarily reflect its actual performance once it reaches live.
Have you even flown the F-111A after the FM changes? The others aren’t going to be that much better.
1 Like
Even even better: Kiwi F-16’s
F111E wasn’t very special, not much very different form the 111A, the 111F was an acceptable jump bc it gave increased capabilities without too much difference.
2 Likes
used the wrong words. They have been corrected.
AIM-9L is a pretty big difference, and of course the F should have 9Ms. Plus higher countermeasures count like the F. It’s similar to the WTD61 or new Italian Tornado.
1 Like