It should be able to sustain a turn better than an F-4, yet in game, using the airbrake provides less drag than tapping the elevators. This is WAY worse than the J-22B being at 3.7. Why is gaijin not able to fix issues? Whatever. Maybe I’ll take another 11 month break and see if it’s fixed by then (it won’t be.)
Disgraceful, you are meant to be bombing not carrying your team :D
Love that.
2 Likes
Its true the amount of people who dont utilize the minimap to bomb people chasing you is crazy
2 Likes
But that’s the f model. The a model with the f14 engines is so much worse
Not by much, besides it doesn’t change the 2000 round gun which is what i ised on the F model. I personally dont like strike aircraft to negin with and i can tell you the A model is nothing compared to thr Su-24 at 11.3 lmao
Also played like a fighter lmao, and the Su-24 likes to stay just about subsonic unlike the F111A
1 Like
F-111 is fighta not bomba
(Legit one of my best games I ever had btw, I think this is my record, and it was in a fricken vark 😭)
The F-111F and F-111C sustain significantly better than the F-4E:
Wing sweep 0, combat flaps for the F-111F:
Wing sweep 20 that the Varks automatically go to when set to 0 manually at high speed: No combat flaps.
Only the F-111A is worse than the F-4E.
2 Likes
worlds apart
1 Like
source?
no : found one
yes: make bug report
lack of easy to read bug reports, maybe?
as none are actually matching your issue:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder?from=now%252Fd-6mo&s=F-111&to=now%252Fd
which doesn’t solve anything, as you’re quitting your issue without making any bug report to make it fixed,…