It should be able to sustain a turn better than an F-4, yet in game, using the airbrake provides less drag than tapping the elevators. This is WAY worse than the J-22B being at 3.7. Why is gaijin not able to fix issues? Whatever. Maybe I’ll take another 11 month break and see if it’s fixed by then (it won’t be.)
1 Like
Disgraceful, you are meant to be bombing not carrying your team :D
1 Like
Love that.
2 Likes
Its true the amount of people who dont utilize the minimap to bomb people chasing you is crazy
2 Likes
But that’s the f model. The a model with the f14 engines is so much worse
Not by much, besides it doesn’t change the 2000 round gun which is what i ised on the F model. I personally dont like strike aircraft to negin with and i can tell you the A model is nothing compared to thr Su-24 at 11.3 lmao
Also played like a fighter lmao, and the Su-24 likes to stay just about subsonic unlike the F111A
1 Like
F-111 is fighta not bomba
(Legit one of my best games I ever had btw, I think this is my record, and it was in a fricken vark 😭)
The F-111F and F-111C sustain significantly better than the F-4E:
Wing sweep 0, combat flaps for the F-111F:
Wing sweep 20 that the Varks automatically go to when set to 0 manually at high speed: No combat flaps.
Only the F-111A is worse than the F-4E.
2 Likes
worlds apart
1 Like
source?
no : found one
yes: make bug report
lack of easy to read bug reports, maybe?
as none are actually matching your issue:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder?from=now%252Fd-6mo&s=F-111&to=now%252Fd
which doesn’t solve anything, as you’re quitting your issue without making any bug report to make it fixed,…