Make a bug report for it to get removed. If it isnt accurate, i dont want it to carry it.
Keep in mind top tier stuff will be bad since like half, if not more, of the tech is classified or export restricted.
i googled for 120mm KET the one that equivalent to 3BM60, nothing of said specification is public aside from penetrator length, material, speed, mass and maker
War Thunder has historically accurate vehicles.
Historically accurate vehicles =/= reenactment LARPing game.
Except they did. A2 stores had to get used somehow, and we weren’t going to recycle the rounds.
2 Likes
Many years ago T-tank players using 3BM42(1986) against Leo players who using DM53(2001).The result is T-tank’s victory rate is lower than 20%.
I think that’s why NATO tanks missing their best ammo.
1 Like
Source?
3BM46/60 are long rod rounds
They’re not adding anti-ERA tips/modifiers so there’s no point
How good is DM53 vs 3BM60 in game
Then you realise why the did add better nato rounds
We will ignore how M829A3 is just an ERA tip and DM63 is just less explosive propellant and doesn’t have better pen
This is a game remember that
this is just what i said but longer, it still doesnt tell the penetrating capabilities also KET was made out of tungsten alloy this is uranium, WRONG ammo if you want DU ammo in game for NATO, the response will be soviet and chinese tanks also getting DU penetrator
explain how they are “artificially underperforming” please
3 Likes
NATO tanks are not artificially under-performing.
And NATO tanks do have the best ammo in the game.
Soviet tech tree can’t get on-par ammo until T-14 gets added.
So, USSRTT players should be allowed to use earlier Soviet era tanks from the 1990s to replace current Russian tanks, in order to reduce the unfair technological advantage of USSRTT？ For example, object195, object477/A, object299, object490A, these tanks carry 152mm tank guns with no less power than object292, most of which are unmanned turrets, and have frontal armor with KE of over 1000mm. Would these be more fair?
1 Like
Still wont be, untill gaijin will cope about 152mm version
these will scared off NATO mains especially USA
Nato tanks have the best “WRONG” ammo in the game. Fixed that for you
Of course it wouldn’t be fairer, although some of these tanks haven’t been fully completed yet, even the basically completed 195 and 477A are far stronger than modern Russian tanks today
How is it wrong?
The ammo is correct, as proven by test fire documents as well as Willi Odermatt, a Swiss mathematician.
I mean the hardware level that can be reflected in the game, as for the advantages of modern tanks such as fire control that cannot be reflected in the game
how are the rounds artificially under performing?