Vs the Radar of the Su-30 which is literally Saurons Eye
yeah im suffering through the gripen C atm and god is it awful I couldnt even pick up an SU30SM 10km in front of me at 7km altitude
Yeah, it’s one thing to compare the Goldfish-M to other M-Scans, but with E-scans in the theatre too, it’s hopeless. Especially as that’s all you fight in the FGR4
Before Su-30 and Rafale were added
Disabling the Radar and going full stealth mode was your best option knowing that Darters have 6km range and using your HMD.
In SB I still do it ))))
Full Stealth mode for the Win )))))
1 Like
Just a shame the IRST is so weak at the moment
#German_EF_for_the_Win
#except_for_skins
Ah, but need that LWR 😜
Eh, just an Gimmick…
Nah, did actually save me from a ka52 in a GSB match before
It is as half the things that target you dont set it off.
Gaijin thinks passive tracking systems like those found on the 2S38 use no kind of ranging laser.
They just know the range…
1 Like
Yeah, and then Gaijin questions typhoon being able to do the same with IRST for guiding AMRAAM 🤣
5 Likes
With the result:
Currently not Possibly to code, maybe in the future :/
honestly, is see asraam being good in the SIM, but why should i ever use asraam in ARB when i can use the AMRAAMs or even in the future meteor.
I would rather have dogfight missles as alternative
1 Like
Clear Marketing lie
3 Likes
Ngl, I can’t wait for the IIR generation to come because of the sheer amount of arguing that will happen when someone’s missile is mismodeled or worse than the other missiles. The amount of chaos will be glorious.
1 Like
ASRAAM still has an notable advantage over MICA in terms of speed / time to target. Also seeker gimbal limits and track rate are better than MICA IR (not that track rate matters too much in game).
1 Like
If you can maintain any range, then youll have your answer. ASRAAMs sheer speed will make defending even harder as you will have little time to react and the lack of RWR warning means you ll not a see a typhoon coming without your own eyes.
I can see it being a very potent third partier and whilst sure iris-T will do better in ultra close quarters, ASRAAM is no slouch either
Range is entirely dependent on how they choose to model the seekers, both could be equally limited in terms of max lock ranges (especially if no LOAL is modeled) at which point ASRAAMs speed wins and the maneuverability is equal past point blank range.
The better question is how both will fair with Flare resistance at ranges where that advantage would actually matter
It’s also worth mentioning that ASRAAM is the only one that isn’t TVC, and we all know the issues with TVC