they would have to do that for every scan pattern, on every radar they gace TWS+
thats the problem, if you hard code it its going to be a pain in the ass to change something about it or even adding new planes/ radars that would get that feature
Proving me right again and again.
Its language issues on your sides not understanding clear sources of the english language. Stay with french sources
Well then gaijin needs to make tws++ with some esa radar code spiced in, i believe gaijin can do it, maybe by christmas.
nah they are working exclusively on TVC for Jets until christmas for the F22
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
so where is your source that states that:
The NATO document literally shows you what type Brimstone uses and explains it in great details.
In the quotation in the message.
That one’s a dud.
Honestly, while I applaud @Gunjob , @DevilO6 and others for the effort- @Mulatu_Astatke didn’t even know Brimstone did not have and IR seeker at the start of this discussion.
If one of his core beliefs is that a missile he doesn’t even understand isn’t capable of ATR, then let him think that, there is no point in arguing with an ideologue.
1 Like
If it had IR we could have FnF Brimstones…Alas it was never implemented
Correct me if I’m wrong, but judging by the fact that it’s a radar… Information it aquires can not be a flat 2d image. It would be a set of gradients variety of which is being determined by distance to the measured point. Which is, inherently, a 3d model. The fact of being a radar should also allow for far more easy and precise filtering by, for example, speed (moving objects) or a set of predetermined patterns, for example a massive clutter cloud (tree).
UPD. Now that I’m researching the topic more - figured out that MMW is incredibly sensitive to metal.
Martel was implemented with a different guidance type to bring it inline with what the devs wanted, there is no reason that the same could not have happened with Brimstone.
It ‘could’ have been given IR capability rather than MMW in WT, it could have been given a MMW LOBL only capability with a boosted seeker range.
The reason Brimstone wasn’t implemented in a way that made it strong was that a dev decided thus, nothing more and nothing less.
I think this is the highest level of “my favourite tech surely cant be worse in anyway compared to x” ive ever seen
2 Likes
you see it from him all the time, especially if it is about british tech
Guys I’m going crazy or after new micro-patch Typhoon turns even worse?
Placebo, the typhoon can still hold his own even after the nerfs, brought a 3v1 to a draw(enemy still won bc points) against a su30 f18 and j10, killed the last player in the j10 by ramming him while literally half dead, would have outright won if a lucky shot didnt disable my radar.
there aint no way your arguing brimstone cant designate its own targets lmao, what are you even doing here at this point mate. I cant even attempt to defend you with this one bud.
1 Like
Don’t even bother. He’s just trolling at this point.
I’m fairly certain he’d even try and argue that the typhoon wasn’t even able to take off at this point
3 Likes
Thats like saying CR2 isnt bad because I destroyed 3 tanks with it.
You are obviously a better pilot than the players you ended up facing at the end.