Chill the slander, I’ve made 2 reports on rafale, both of which, objectively are fine reports, 1 is based on in game standards, the other, is based on data that was available. I don’t talk on here about rafale, so what do you mean?
That may be the case, more recently I see other names and I have been baited by them myself.
It isn’t slander though if it’s true? Did you not submit a report that had nerfed the Rafale on December 10th even though a key aspect of the report had been reverted?
Here’s the report in question: Rafale Rip VNe Speed Too High // Gaijin.net // Issues
The question was not, “Is the report valid?” On many aspects the Eurofighter reports which are regarded as “nerfs” have been valid as well. People are not complaining if it’s valid, but they’re complaining about why people are focusing/nitpicking nerf reports. It would only be right to point out that most of us would not care about Eurofighter at all if it had not been for you.
This thread should not become a Rafale vs Typhoon situation, please keep it on topic and respect what mods said already.
Read the report, i reported the IAS limit which has not been reverted, so what do you mean?
Again I don’t talk about eurofighter here, I seem to be catching strays. Anyway let’s keep it to rafale as per mod.
This is the Typhoon thread
Doh 😭😭 my bad
You ignored my question can the Rafale pull 15G fully loaded?
Why was the report actioned by Gaijin to nerf the Typhoons G limit to 12G
When Rafale is allowed to keep 15G+
This is why we get frustrated, no one is actioning accepted Typhoon reports
We have had 3 dev servers a live patch 3 months of having a broken jet, another 3 dev servers another patch and all they did was nerf the flight characteristics and not fix the Radar.
Was a report the cause of the 12G limit? Not that I know if
Fair enough, it has not been reverted as of yet. But the question was why “French mains were nerfing Eurofighter”. I only am telling them that it isn’t as one-sided as they make it seem.
Yeah it’s a silly argument spurred by emotion
Well surely you cant make arbitrary changes without a source document?
Changes can be accidental too
The Typhoon feels accidental they should have just buffed the Gripen and not added it at this point.
No Rafale can’t pull 15G fully loaded. I don’t think they nerfed the G-limit of Eurofighter, but rather they reduced the amount of AoA that can be pulled by the wings if the canards remained static. It may be as a result of source materials from a previously rejected report:
Eurofighter Over-Performing In Available AoA // Gaijin.net // Issues
Yes it has been labeled as “not a bug” but it isn’t the first time they have rejected a report only to later on implement it.
What’s hilarious they made these changes to the FM which now make it under perform even more despite bug reports from 3 months ago saying it should perform better. It still performs worse than the prototype with weaker engines in ITR and STR
What’s the context here all I see is different coloured spaghetti and some numbers 🤣