Yes, the developers have decided to not model the downsides of kinematic ranging even if it is currently ahistorical.
It doesn’t matter in any case, I already made sure the developers have access to the full sources.
You do recognise that every source in that bug report was a primary source? So how can it be a “fake nerf”?
1 Like
And every source for it having ranging is a primary source as well. Including the fact it can fire and guide AMRAAMs
I want as much a real rafale than i want a real typhoon, so if there are things that should be corrected i would be grateful if those were reported and not continue in the current mood of this thread which is blaming others for no reason, if you are unhappy about the devs modelling the eurofighter this way, sure, it’s fair enough but when i look at the last comments it’s mostly about french biais, rafale this, rafale that.
2 Likes
Yes, the ranging just isn’t very accurate. That’s what the report states. You should read it :)
There is no source explicitly stating PIRATE can fire and guide AMRAAMs specifically.
They have been reported, that’s the problem. Gaijin either denies them or calls the primary sources fake.
Then you have french mains misinterpreting and twisting sources to try and nerf the typhoon. All the recent pirate related reports from them are proof of that…
9 Likes
Don’t worry, I will be looking into DASS soon enough… Admittedly, information indicates that the current detection range is accurate. Although, its missile tracking and time-to-impact should not be very accurate.
Nerf/Buff ≠ Fix.
Everyone love to use those two in such a way that it is not clear if it is gaijin doing gaijin or just x thing being that way.
Don’t worry, keep this up, we’ll fix the Rafale soon…back down to 6x MICA, no IRST, no magic IIs, PESA radar, nerf the FM, etc.
2 Likes
Okay, Gaijin keeps denying major fixes for the Typhoon whilst “fixing” things that weren’t incorrect on the Rafale
Well, anyway i just hope things will be done since from what i get of this thread the typhoon takes more time to accelerate compared to the rafale for example, or the ‘cobra’ button which seem to in the end ‘reduce’ performance of the eurofighter when it is not used.
Besides 6x MICA which I agree with – IRST, Magic II and AESA (underperforms but Devs confirmed ESAs are missing some features) are correct.
I cannot find any source stating Rafale F3R had IRST, seems to be removed until F4. The 6x MICAs is gonna be an uphill battle because it was compatible and tested and also exported even if never done in service. This is in contrast to EFT where 8x AMRAAM was never tested which is the sticking point even though some concepts existed.
2 Likes
Can y’all stop going here and there giving what is essentially “threats” to nerf an aircraft? I mean feel free to do so (as long as sources are appropriate), but I don’t see any reason to vocally announce it just to stir up this “rivalry”
10 Likes
Sorry friend but it really is all your side.
You have a couple of instigators that want and believe the Typhoon hasn’t advanced the 80s Tornado project!
That Germany, Spain, UK and Italy do not have the expertise to develop an airframe as capable as Typhoon.
In response to this it’s
PIRATE is old and rubbish
Typhoon should have installed an AESA Radar right away
Typhoons crap at slow speed.
Typhoon cant super cruise etc etc.
And to top it off it’s now well if you lot knew how to bug report properly it would all be sorted…
It has all got just a little bit toxic which is a shame as I bloody love ALL EURO DELTAS and to have this constant bickering between Rafale and Typhoon is draining.
AESA radar was introduced on Rafale F3.4, a standard prior to Rafale F3R. Feel free to report it but I have multiple primary sources showing as such. 6x MICA is gonna be an uphill battle since it was tested and exported. FM is also gonna be an uphill battle. The IRST should be reported by me soon, just missing one more source.
3 Likes
Maybe the Mods should start giving breaks for some people which allways start the fire
I have no problem with the FM my issue is Typhoon was nerfed to 11-12G yet Rafale routinely pulls 14-15G like the Typhoon used to be able to.
Now we know that’s just fiction as no loaded airframe would ever exceed 9G+
We really just want some fairness
2 Likes
I’ve never seen anything credlible that suggests IRST was not possible to mount + other replies from DGA personel.
I explained it often enough and I don’t get why we still stick to configs that don’t exist in Service aircraft. It has only been exported with ISE, which is arguably not a F.3R.
To be fair, a lot of these nonsense arguments/fights had been started by Fireball (A UK main as far as I’m aware) as early as December 10th of which I had to submit counter-reports to rectify his reports.
1 Like