Well. This part is actually very funny.
Gaijin say that if they can’t find the data, they take the data from the direct predecessor. Like in the case of Blue Vixen → Captor.
And the direct predecessor is SRAAM. With a control activation delay time of 0 seconds.
2 Likes
I had to double check on this, you’re right SRAAM doesn’t have any guidance delay at all.
1 Like
It is still really solid lol. The US is legit one of the last nations that is in need of a better 14.0 aircraft.
And yes, I have played the F-15E, F-15I, Rafale and I’m 1 aircraft away from the FGR.4.
1 Like
quad racks dont work. only ones with any chance would be the CFT AMBER racks that leave it with only 16 AMRAAM
untill enemy has 2 braincells - it is useless
so true… worsest 14.0.
Lot of aamrams, compared to Eurofighter aamrams count
if the F-15E pilot also only has 2 braincells, sure.
2 Likes
not compared to original 22 AMRAAM
Well, he would defend himself, yes. But wouldnt be able to attack at all
ARHs in game are just bad, due of multipath, easy notching
Insane take right here
1 Like
https://x.com/BAESystemsAir/status/1810660585287094301
double pylon aim-120.
but for su-30sm their added double pylon, although there are no photos with them on the su-30cm (not the su-35s).
Gaijin double standart
It’s a render. It’s not an actual photograph.
Just showcasing some proposed modifications and it was probably just an animation mistake as well, as its not even one of the listed modifications, those being:
- SPEAR-3
- CAPTOR-E
- DASS upgrades
- Striker II HMD
- New Cockpit avionics
- New CPUs / networking
- Datalink improvements for Drone intergration
I cant comment on the Su-30, probably suspect, but would be easier proving the Su-30 couldnt have that loadout rather than the Typhoon could. Besides. Its not a hill worth dying on at the moment, given we are still waiting on CAPTOR-M even being modeled
2 Likes
Like as su-30sm.
Just su-30sm from russia. But su-30sm doesn’t even have a render from the manufacturer.
What are you on about? Su-30SM is not real?
Whether or not there is any proof for twin-rail R-77-1 mounts for the Su-30SM
1 Like
Oh that makes sense now. Thank you
Because there is no proof for double racks on su30sm. It was never meant for them, it’s ridiculous why gaijin is putting them on all flankers instead of only the 35s that was literally him built for those double racks
2 Likes
Gaijin don’t like reality it seem that war proved a lot of how overperform RU stuff compare to real life and how underperforming western stuff performs compare to real life Stinger for example shot down KA-52 in that war while in the game it can’t even lock it pass 2km or when hovering KA-52 got shotdown by ATGM which rise the question about it even have MAWS at the first place?