I wonder, currently the Mach cone is in the cockpit, is this correct?
Make it an Marketing Lie and its an deal
1 Like
eh we have 3 eurofighter threads in total to change to if one gets closed for a time period, so i dont mind realy
3 Likes
Europe. Build a plane that can fly.
You need to stop believing those marketing lies. The Eurofighter Typhoon is clearly in the wrong tree and should be our top tier IFV
5 Likes
Eurofighter - Inability to fire AMRAAM from PIRATE IRST lock answer:
"Dev’s response:
In order to fully issue target designation, missiles with ARLGSN require the speed of approach to the target, and the range.
And the PIRATE OLS can only approximately estimate the range through triangulation, and for this it is necessary to perform certain maneuvers. The report does not say that the AIM-120 can be launched based on target designation from the OLS, not a mistake.
At the same time, the OLS can transmit target designation for missiles with IR homing heads in the game, so the current implementation does not contradict the data from the report."
Which bases on this:
Eurofighter - PIRATE missing passive ranging capability and here the answer is:
“Right now it’s impossible to implement, will be implemented in the future.
Report has been converted into suggestion.”
Also the TGP MFD is rotated when you equip the LITENING pod.
And we’re still missing the PIRATE camera MFD screen which would show you the locked target like what the F-14B has with TISEO. PIRATE is also missing the functionality of tracking targets using the optical camera.
Yeah honestly this would be my most hoped for feature to be added. It’s criminal that it’s still missing it’s functionality for this long. Also the gimbal limits of the TGP MFD’s are about half of what the actual TGP pod has.
i wonder what this means
what are these strange words
mmmhmm
M. a. r. k. e. t. i. n. g. L. i. e.
ohhh
oh
i see ok
pack it up guys he’s right
16 Likes
Well, saw the report for it, but it somehow does not effect the EF-2000
Alas, where would Europe be without internet experts to tell them what to do? Eh?
I think you are taking the word “picture” to literally here. in that context its more like this:
1 Like
Yeah it’s weird, I’m not sure if it affects the F-2000A or not as I don’t have it but it definitely affects the FGR.4.
If it does affect the F-2000A too then I think it might be having PIRATE which causes it.
Unironically true, if the aircraft has a maximum speed of mach 1.5 in supercruise he will be unable to pull back the throttle and efficiently (cruise) at supersonic speeds. He has to stay at maximum mil thrust especially with a true full air to air load.
Likewise, the “sensor fusion” is just using the terminology loosely to match competitors in that regard. The Gripen-E and the Rafale (all variants) have considerably better “sensor fusion” than the Eurofighter. If they can’t prove any actual comparable capabilities to the Rafale… why claim it is equal? So far the only definitive advantage over the Rafale (and not really one - at that) is the enhanced flight performance of a larger fighter more optimized for wave drag.
The downside to that is that it uses a TON of legacy hardware on the inside and simply isn’t optimized to reduce RCS in a modern air to air scenario. Very few hard features of the design reflect RCS reduction efforts. Slap some paint on the leading edges and call it a day will ya?
2 Likes
i mean the 27mm has decent pen and velocity as well as firerate. laser brimstones wouldnt be half bad either
This must be awkward for you
23 Likes
Again, this is Mirage 2000 levels of information “fusion”. The DASS uses legacy hardware like radar based MAWS.
watch how he’ll argue that its not “real fusion” and is just “overlaying data”
LMAOO
16 Likes
I wish the DASS would be as effectiv as written in game
Why do you think radar maws are a legacy system?