Eurofighter Typhoon (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion

The AOA of the missile is our best chance and getting this fixed right now, it’s the only absolutely measurable item of data we have from current sources that can be used as a source.

You can see that the missile is effectively utilising body lift and large angles of attack to generate signficant load factors at the point of launch, far beyond what the fins can produce on their own.

We can then use this information, a bit of pythagoras and calc to determine how much G the missile is pulling in that moment, but not what the maximum the the missile is capable of.

This is because we don’t have any source or information on what the maximum G is for the misisle, we only have information regarding the maximum AOA, angle deviation and displacement at the time of launch.

Has anyone else noticed an Issue too with the Targeting Pod? Because normally its Gen 3 TVD, but sometimes the quality goes down to Gen.1 TVD

Oh, thats normal.
It’s simply PIRATE being jelous you are not using it. (even if you do not have it on the plane)

German EF has no PIRATE )))))
And still has the issue:(

As i said

Do I even want to understand how an part of the plane which does not exist can effect it? XD

It just works

You forgot we live in a spaghetti code

Pretty common issue, I’ve had it on Gripen, Tornado GR4 and Typhoon, you sometimes get Gen1 press the keybind again, goes to correct gen. I’ll try to make an effort to capture the issue and report it at some point.

2 Likes

So I am not schizo :)

I did a report for that

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/s1VligSayPhX

Guess it broke again

Me did an report for this (the extreme Weathering on the EF-2000)
[Community Bug Reporting System]

The Brimstone report got Accepted as Suggestion
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Yjnp0lyaM3LR?comment=8EePwCa97Thz2mRYxfusaZRI

2 Likes

the usual

They’re really afraid of how capable it would be if modelled even halfway right, it seems

Updated List:

Accepted

Sensors / Avionics / HUD / Radar

Flight Performance / Handling

Engine / Afterburner / Smoke

Armament / Missiles / Bombs

Visuals / Model / Textures

Suggestion

Weapons & Munitions

Radar & Sensors

HMD (Helmet Mounted Display) & Display

Warning Systems & Countermeasures

Fixed

Flight Performance

Radar & Sensors

Weapons & Loadouts

Cockpit & Interface

Defensive Systems

Visuals & Modeling

Miscellaneous

Not a Bug

Weapons & Loadouts

No Label / Info Requested

Weapons & Loadouts

HMD & Displays

Visuals & Modeling

Cockpit & Interface

Flight Performance

Radar & Sensors

Cockpit & Interface

Visuals & Modeling

Miscellaneous

Updated as of 2.45.1.93 (17.5.25)

4 Likes

Suggestion is the usual response for such a report. But yeah, it’s really funny how people complain so much about Brimstones and yet we have the weakest possible variant, missing most of its features and is underperforming notably.

1 Like

Good to know, but why not the usual accepted?

I wasted my time in this report

I have no idea on the precise meanings of things, but I think anything to do with how things are modeled rather than straight up game bugs are considered as suggestions