Also why not?
Because BS is literally the short name for it.
Source: look in the EF Cockpit))))
To make things more on topic, the described IIR targeting on AASM works the exact same way the IIR seeker works on Storm Shadow/SCALP
So anti-tank Storm Shadows when?
6 Likes
yeah i feel like we should make a bug-report on that, to preserve histrical accuracy of the weaponry the rafale carries
Thats you stating that.
Every official source stated otherwise now.
That explains why u believed your IR is better then mmw as well.
You completly had the capabilities of the IR wrong in thw first place xD
The operator swapping to look at hammer and hammer looking at a high density IR environment through their screen
4 Likes
is the swiss trial IE the ones that are not publicly released
what the bias
French BIAS ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?
fianally a worthy opnent for Russian BIAS
1 Like
This is a Tranche 1 Eurofighter vs a rafale F3R
1 Like
I admit it, i wrote it, im the fanboy, take me away. Honestly that is one of the most silly comparison charts ive ever seen when it comes to how they rate the vehicle.
2 Likes
Hey!!! there’s a eurofighter vs rafale thread out there for this
To be fair to the British, the Germans were the buffons on the EF Project. We (the Germans) wanted to use AN/APG-65 as the radar initially
2 Likes
“We” as germans or “We” as britains?
Germans
mega copium that rafale, we don’t even know the variations of the comparisons
would have been better for WT honestly, as it stands the AN/APG-65 works alot better than the Captor
Germany. Fist they wanted 65, and then a modified one called MSD-2000
1 Like
CAPTOR should be better than the Blue Vixen. It doesn’t meet that specs. It is by definition underperforming.
1 Like
Do not post the Swiss trials, they were never approved for public release and are in fact still classified.
18 Likes