Yes the SAL version
Not the IR
fake news
Primary sources would disagree. But sure.
Well the source you showed doesn’t sooooo
Says that the seeker is low tech and can’t lock tanks and is only active within 1.5km
Please send us more primary sources. It went so well for us last time.
1 Like
Where does it explicitly say it can’t lock tanks and can only hit stationary targets?
Figure 2 literally shows how the seeker acquires the target at two different locations from the original estimated target coordinates which demonstrates it can hit moving targets.
2 Likes
Hmm big area looks nothing like a tank
If i squint and step like 10 steps back it could look like a blob (tank from a distance) clearly proof enough
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
- Im not english
- What i responded to
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Figure 3 has no tank it is just recognising an area not a tank so it is proof that it can’t lock tanks unless you have other wise
It is based of previous IR images of the area
Here is your Figure 2 explained. And no, unlike you i will not start calling names.
5 Likes
Non-English people are stupid everyone. He said it himself.
1 Like
Landmarks are used to ensure greater accuracy especially in cluttered environments. But they are not necessary.
Besides, this is the Eurofighter thread.
give a source where it states it can lock onto tanks
523 unread posts
guys what are yall doing
1 Like
I already have. It probably got community flagged, though. So why should I bother again?
you mean this?
it doesnt say it can lock onto tanks