Pretty sure there aren’t any that are public. That being said, we know the EFT at the very least met (likely exceeded) all requirements barring landing distance:
So saying the EFT is overperforming is wrong. Its underperforming by at least a little, possibly a lot.
Out of curiosity what did they want the landing distance to be, if they didn’t believe it was achievable with the conditions they were working with?
No clue, I have limited access to the documents others have used to bug report stuff.
yes i said the fm is based on the assumption that the plane met all requirements, and it performs up to said requirements.
one question what makes you think it “likely exceeded”, were you involved in the development of the ef program at all, know anyone who has been involved, ever flown one irl perhaps, have been told this by someone who flew it irl?, do you have any form of source for that claim or do you just THINK it exceeded the requirements, are you just making baseless claims based off of vibes perhaps?
Landing distance was to be 700 m. It was only not met “in the most adverse conditions”
In game it falls short of a couple of them.
it falls short of them within the margin of error that gaijin deems acceptable, this margin is the same as every other aircraft in the game.
IIRC Gaijin have denied bug reports before when the aircraft is within 5% of the expected value. Last time someone posted in game testing STR at Sea Level fell short by ~7.5% and STR at 10,000 ft dry power fell short by ~13%, so those two are outside Gaijin’s tolerance.
It is generally good practice to exceed design requirements. The majority of vehicles predicted to meet their requirements during development exceed some if not all of them. I’m almost willing to guarantee somewhere exists a source saying those initial requirements were at least in part exceeded too.
It literally doesnt tho, the devs said so themselves that it performs “close to” ESR-D specs.
Oh that ones super easy to answer.
If you actually bothered to read the ESR-D document, the EFA with its 82kN engines was within no more than 1.66 deg/s of the ESR-D specs, usually underperforming by less than 1deg/s, and actually already exceeded all the acceleration requirements quite substantially. Tack on a ~9% thrust increase and its not a stretch to assume it exceeded the reqs.
Sooooooo you admit you were lying about it overperforming then?
so what im hearing is that you think the plane is underperforming by a mystery amount and it should be buffed to a set of mystery values which will somehow make it more realistic? i asked if you had the docs for the aircraft with the ej200 engines and you didnt say, we do not know how much the ej200 effected performance it is reasonable to assume that it only met the requirements.
Nope, maybe stop lying for a sec and read stuff properly. All I said was that you are wrong in stating that it is overperforming (the gaijin devs themselves state its underperforming), and that its possible its overperforming by a significant amount. I never said it should be buffed to a random figure above the minimum stated requirement.
They arent going to be only meeting requirements if they were already just about meeting requirements when they had less thrust, stop being dumb.
when in this thread did i say it was over performing? please enlighten me
Personally if they would fix the radar. So I don’t feel like I’m fighting the radar half the time I would be fairly content with the aircraft.
Who needs a radar anyway? Be like a true man. 1v1 dogfight, guns only. Show them you have the biggest, umm, drop tanks on the field!
Words to live by. But I am one of the weaklings that use the radar lock to get the gun leads on the CCIP.
While the documents aren’t classified (has been confirmed), it has been said more than enough times that the user should provide additional info for classification, especially if confidential/secret is written onto them
3. User’s obligations regarding Restricted Information. If the User publishes the documentation which may be reasonably deemed as Restricted Information according to this Military Restrictions Section or has been earlier regarded as such, the User shall provide sufficient evidence that the information no longer falls within the scope of Restricted Information as defined above (e.g., a valid source from the list specified in paragraph 2(ii)(d) above, a statement on declassification, etc.), or otherwise prove the legality of their publication.
ATTENTION! If there are reasonable grounds to believe that you failed to comply with the rules of this Military Restrictions Section, or your post otherwise contains Restricted Information or other content prohibited to distribution, the Administration, at its sole discretion, may remove your post, and in some cases - suspend your Gaijin account up to permanent ban (e.g., if repeated or severe violation(-s) have occurred)**.
Don’t worry young padawan, we have all been there. Eurofighter is a ferocious beast, not many can control it from the get go. But fear not, once you spend enough time with it, everyone, be it Russians with their thrust vectoring, or Americans with their AMRAAM spamming, will learn to fear you, and will hide their tails on the sheer sound of your engines rumbling!
Buh mah ammo conservation!
