Really?
Have a link to support?
1 Like
Gotta wait till they add them to be fair
Nah. Not a chance.
A bit like we still wont have BOL added by then either
Well a soulution could be to have all IIR’s for all euros, but I don’t know how much like that idea.
Except for my beloved italians which integrated both :)
28G Mach 2.5 15km range ASRAAMs :D
This is RavenE. FOR 200°, eFOV 140°, thus mFOV about 60°.
I think I read somewhere that RavenE and ECRS2 have the same repositioner, or at least very comparable, so I’m more inclined to think ECRS2 is like RavenE in that sense.
Is that the stats going by how Camm is modeled?
I couldnt recall whether it was 60/40 or 70/30. I guessed as we have 60° mode in-game.
But the point still stands.
eFoV might be higher, but that doesnt mean it would be in any way, shape or form relevant to the current in-game modeling of either the Mk1 or Mk2
Yep…
Jesus🫠
Missile not even out yet
I think the aim9x might unironically be the better performing one, if things stayed like this.
The range is tricky because it is land launched, but CAMM-ER is definetly meant to reach 45km, but can barely do more than the CAMM at about 20km. (there is a source though that htey had to reduce the amount of fuel in the base CAMM when testing it because it was ballistically traveling over 60km and flying out of the test area)
Definetly not as fast as it should be, but again, tricky to report because land launched.
But the pull is only 28G.
Probably, gotta pamper to the Americans. And R-73M / R-74 will be the hardest to flare by a wide margin
1 Like
How about ASRAAM-T?
1 Like
Sure, because game works wrong in that context as well.
Some might say Michael IR
Where is ESM mode?
Its a marketing lie sorry, only the soviets fitted their aircraft with ESM
:P
May i ask do you know what Is the differences of a PESA an AESA and how each other works, i wont critizise you depending on your knowledge because not everyone its versed in the theme but i Will correct It
You can see the short burn motor here
2 Likes
*and China :3