These guys crammed 1000 elements into a 200mm missile antenna.
and these guys are not talking about the EF
But technology is there.
the paper is from 2019
i didnt knew that they used time travel for the EF to bring technologies from the future into the late 90s to build the EF
onop of that it is for satilite comunication and not to detect objects
Erm
Flat Panel Antennas (FPA) at Ka-band (27.5-30 GHz) are the forefront of future technology
Those things are cutting edge technology today. The MAWS was built 30+ years ago.
This is what an array of 8 Ka band TRMs looked like 16 years ago (from here):
Though once again the MAWS is not AESA.
2 Likes
The tech is there, but was it there 30 years ago…
Well then, here’s a Zhuk form 2007, so if Russians had printed circuits in 2007, so did the West too.
And this is Xband.
Even better. PESA is thinner.
i dont care
i asked for a picture of the array that the EF uses not of a picture of a T/R module that the russians made a decade after the MAW arrays for the EF were made
all you have done is make assumptions and now that you are getting asked for proof you are doing nothing but deflecting
you assume the EF array is Ka band
you assume how the EF array is mounted
but you didnt bring a single source for what you are saying
1 Like
Doesn’t look like you could put 1000 of these 2007 transistors in the MAW of the EFT tho…
Ofc I did, but then, I’m sure you can explain how Preatorian plots track’s vector.
I’m listening…
You think? They’re Xband. :D
especially since they would have to time travel into the late 90s to mount them into the EFs
1 Like
Ok, but why are you arguing using a tech that is vastly different from what the MAW uses…
It seems like you are just grasping at straws rn
No, it’s not “vastly” different, it’s even newer then PESA Flame claims EF has.
Further, you have a link in my post that shows a construction of the PESA array (vertical section) and I linked that particular article for that particular reason. PESA array is even thinner than AESA’s so Flame’s idea that it somehow doesn’t fit due “wiring” or whatever doesn’t hold water.
If anything, every radiating element (TRM in AESA) would be thicker in AESA than its equivalent on PESA.
that is the whole issue
how are they using tech from 2007 in the 90s
an article from 2019 to somehow proof the stand of technology in the 90s
none of these arguments make sense without the existance of time travel
and none of the stuff you showed matters for the arrays on the EF
2 Likes
Man, I hate when
Looks into notes
Italians time travel to get superior technology.
I just hate when they do it.
9 Likes
Those bloody italians at it again?!
3 Likes
Where?
We are just built different.
1 Like
nah not you
but your future selfs that gave you time travel tech
Where what?