Eurofighter Typhoon (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion (Part 2)

Would be a bit old if it wasn’t intended to be better, given the timeframes we’re looking at.

5 Likes

a common thread when arguing with him

7 Likes

Thread becomes Gotham at least once a year

4 Likes

I blame Morvran. Invokes it by terrorising the French.

(This is joke)

Its British law.

1 Like

Always remember who’s the real Joker

Spoiler

AISelect_20260613_150943_Samsung Browser

5 Likes

Mate’s generally on the money with French stuff.

But it wouldn’t be British/French interactions if they weren’t trying to kneecap each other instead of advancing triangles for the good of all.

1 Like

Not gonna lie in 2025 I think Mulatu contributed to at least 1000 messages in the Part 2 euro thread.

No grudge against him though, everyone got their own favourite.

Still a legend
:tries to nerf the Brimstone on EF
:end up buffing them
:3

7 Likes

My frustration with it is if folk stopped trying to screw each other over, we might have gotten somewhere sooner lol

But it be what it be. As an aside, can typhoon carry a heavier bomb load? Kinda miserable to get the AESA on dev with piddly payload.

What impressed me about that one was how Gunjob yeeted the source and it got implemented like 24h later in the lil weekly patch/fix.

Ekhem
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Qza4jKAVUH0x

4 Likes

Apologies, but BRM 1 was for sure Gunjob😂

5 Likes

Yep, that was the case.

5 Likes

Ok, so it was 48-72 hours later :))

Zusammenfassung

Reported the 7th
Fix was announced 2 days later

Zusammenfassung

Screenshot_20260613_152501_Chrome

Was a Buff by 300% ))))

Still, far from my best
image
image
image
0-Fix in 6 min.

5 Likes

Speedrun

Spoiler

16 Likes

Can you do that with the UV tint before part #3?

11 Likes

I can only see a preview of your comment as it’s hidden. But:

  • The mass is not a mistake
  • Those requirements were intact met as explained in the bug report
4 Likes