I mean at 40kft the having a tail design really isnt going to matter.
I think its something to do with how the light reflects off it but also if the aircraft crashes then its harder to ID both the aircrafts origins and the pilot or something
When will the 4-pop option for BOL

For chaff, being bol doesn’t matter too much. But for flares it matters a lot.
My feeling contradicts that. Large countermeasures make it easy to evade ARH missiles, and even standard countermeasures allow for easier evasion than BOL.
This is just my personal impression from playing the game, so it has no factual basis.
Ive given up trying to notch missiles with bol, better to crank and be safe.
EFT and our latest Aussie addition;
XI (F) Squadron RAF Typhoon at Royal Malaysian Air Force Base Butterworth with a Royal Australian Air Force F-18.
…Or just make them as strong as they realistically should be.
Good luck asking for that
Why has the performance actually been nerfed this much? What’s more surprising is that these nerfs were implemented before ARH was introduced back when multipathing was still at 100 meters.
Because back then the gripen was a meta airframe and you could get away with effectively just loading full flares, setting periodic, sitting below 100m and being literally immortal.
640 flares → one flare per second → more than 10 minutes constant immunity :D
No radar missiles?
Marketing lie unfortuantely
Is there a triple mount available?
I don’t know in relation to the Eurofighter, but the APKWS has yet to be seen at full capacity on TER-9’s, it’s only ever been loaded on opposite sides, but it should be fully capable of supporting up to 3x 19 round pods, even though it’s only been seen mounted in 7 round pods there are elongated 19 round pods for them offered by Martin Engineering.
Mayhaps a bug report is needed?
Not saying snail chose to ignore it but they could’ve also just forgotten








