I’m suffering a lot with AIM-7s, 40% of the time is just a hit, 40% a critical, 20% severe/kill
this is so abismal
1 Like
Yeah aim 7s are pure rage bait in wt. after using the 27er for so long I forgot how garbage sparrows are
1 Like
Does anybody have sources about the AGM-114F Hellfire turn performance/G overload? I figure since Brimstone missile chassis is based on the Boeing AGM-114F Hellfire, sharing the same flight characteristics, that if there are sources that show AGM-114 Hellfire can pull more than the 7g’s implemented in game, it would carry over to the brimstone.
By a visual standpoint, this looks way more than 7g’s.
3 Likes
To be fair that was a low quality bug report
There were other docs you cant see iirc. You’ll have to ask Devil though if he can share them
But video evidence of it pulling off the rails like that should have been more than enough for the report
since our radar can already function in normal and HDN mode at the same time, how come TWS doesn’t also use standard pulse (since the radar does have it as an option)?
I mean in fairness they are right with their response to that. The document used doesn’t mention AoA at all. It just says it can hit targets 40° off boresight, which Brimstone can do quite easily in game.
Funny how poor the 7M is Skyflash Super Temp is serviceable the rest are just sad.
Can Brimstone hit targets behind it like HAMMER can?
Hammer is more to the sides than behind, and that’s only on a 40,000ft launch;
Brimstone can HOBS and Brimstone 2+ can do it even better but not over the shoulder.
1 Like
Ooh I’m confused why we don’t have Brimstone 2 yet :(
should this really be posted publicly?
2 Likes
Perhaps, but I think the video evidence is pretty damming
SAL weapons are too OP, must be nerfed.
I heard enough, nerf challengers more.
1 Like
There are some documents showing the AASM employement zone can actually be behind the aircraft. Its altitude dependent tho, this could be for a lower altitude scenario
It’s freely available online and has been used several times for different reports, so I guess it’s okay :/
I’ve looked at that report, the sourcing is an artist depiction from the brochure and some general statements from Rafale International. Which are inline with the presentation example to a point, if you launched at the max off boresight shot, within seconds of release that target would be behind you for intents and purposes.
Link pls