Funny that the SPICE can only be mounted on the Inboardwing Station in-game, you’re saying that’s because of the picture. But the picture in the source article shows it mounted on the Centerwing Station, where usually the external tanks are mounted.
Good Ol Marketing lie gaijin again
3 Likes
cant go an update without gaijin screwing over the Eurofighter or nato nations…
1 Like
Does anyone know the scan speed on the Su-30SM2? Depending on how fast it is, could it be possible to form a bug report based on it scanning its entire area using the e-scan speed and as a result, either it should be limited to its mechanical-only scan speed for all search patterns to match the typhoon or the typhoon should have the scan speed increased back up so that both are using e-scan speeds for all patterns? Preferably, both would have their scan speeds based on whether they needed to use mechanical slewing for that scan pattern or not, but since giving radars a single scan speed seems to be the norm, this was the best I could think of, given the time.
1 Like
This was for the proposal for the Eurofighter AK and SPICE 250 ER.
The report was actioned based on the sources that could be confirmed for the standard (Non AK program) Eurofighters
Spoiler
2 Likes
irl or in game?
Irbis on 30sm2 doesn’t have any search zones where it uses its mechanical scan, only uses e scan.
Same with bars on su-30sm, gaijin limits its search zones to its e scan limits
I believe it actually scans slower than the Rafales AESA
Has anyone compared it to the Su-34s PESA…Probably the level Gaijin were going for.
Because how could little old Europe build a Radar that is as good as Russias…
1 Like
Not quite. Rafale’s AESA sits even lower, which is even funnier considering it’s shorter range and then logically would need less dwell time allowing it to scan faster…
Gaijin doesn’t accept reports based on calculations but
the equations here check out. Can give you a general idea of how it should perform.
Edit: it just clocked to me that the physical maximum scan rates here are 168deg/s for a 200km range, and 90.5deg/s for a 400km range. The hypocrisy of calling the CAPTOR-E’s scan speeds improbable/impossible while Irbis-E operates at over twice the maximum speed allowed by physics for its range is incredible.
7 Likes
Aha ok thanks for the reply.
Howere, both are still only marketing proposals or ideas for the future, and not operational.
But I don’t complain, I’m happy to shoot new things in-game, whether it’s realistic or not.
Flankerchan my beloved
1 Like
Its a half decent stop-gap alternative to the in-service FnF weapons we should have which is MMW Brimstone 2/3s
1 Like
Ah thank you very much. I doubt too much difference will be made, but at this point it’s in the game so there’s hope it’ll be fixed eventually (read: after a couple years)
As it stands the SM2 uses its detection range in a 10x10 degree cued scan for its detection range in a 120x9 scan, which should tell you enough about how (un)likely they are to fix it tbh.
1 Like
Yeah I know and understand.
It’s obvious that many weapons are just added for balancing and not due to realism.
I mean, GBU-54/62 and all dumb bombs aren’t yet/were never used irl by the eurofighter user nations. Or Paveway IV by Germany.
And the twin missile carrier for ir missiles was never introduced by any nation. But it’s nice to have it in-game. Only the amraam-tmc is still fully fictional.
Is that unique to the irbis though?
Even having a feature like that is pretty unique to the irbis.
1 Like
My bad there, more meant the captor-e/ecrs but the irbis probably has its fair share of inaccuracy too, regardless of whether that ends up being a pro or a con for the Su-30SM2
The chances of captor being buffed now are marginal too tbh, it would require gaijin devs to suddenly stop being convinced every good piece of british kit is a “marketing lie”
6 Likes