AFAIK interleaved PRF is not implemented for any radar in the game (yet) …
I assume it was.
Radar changes from January
Granted, it doesnt say that it swaps mode, but that is how I read the changes, but no one has ever corrected me before that that isnt how it works.
I also thought that was a core part of the Automatic mode swapping that they added to radars and such to maintain the lock. I thought that was also applied to TWS so you no longer had to swap TWS modes to maintain a track (at least I think i remember having to do that on the Tornado before that was added anyway) and was rather miffed when they removed automatic ACM mode from the F3 because its “not an all-aspect radar” despite it having that feature IRL.
Tornado F3 then I think swaps automatically between LPRF and HPRF.
At least I assumed some of this applied to TWS modes as well
But if it doesn’t. Then the answer is clear. CAPTOR-M is underperforming even more than I originally thought
That is to be expected, Pulse radars are not affected by notching in real life. But the trade off is that they are far more susceptible to ground clutter than Pulse Doppler radars.
No radar in the game has ever switched between different PRFs during TWS mode. Lots of them should, but Gaijin have only ever added automatic mode switching for STT and ACM modes.
1 Like
The AIM-120C-5s are on Typhoon on dev server now
1 Like
Along with Radar fixes and fm buffs?
1 Like
Doesn’t look like it unfortunately
This exactly.
Auto switch only happens when you have a lock (and the IRST issue we had where FOX3 could not be fired before hot fix comes from there).
TWS is just crudely modeled for most modern aircafts, from the gimped captor M to the RBE2 AESA. I understand people complaining about the Captor M currently being complete ASS, but trying to attribute global mis modeling to the Captor only is not the way to go
Haha come on now Morvran, thought you’d know better. You can notch any MPRF or HPRF radar.
I have never had any issues prior to the Typhoon where I was pointing my radar directly at something I could visually see, even in narrow scan and it not be detected.
I have also had a number of times where the target was 100% not in the notch and still not detected. (unless something flying basically straight at you is notching)
Notch gates on BV and CAPTOR-M are identical iirc. Also to your other comment on PRF management that only applies in STT in game. No radar is doing PRF management in TWS.
1 Like
So its really wierd I never had such issues in the Sea Harrier FA2 or Gripen.
Though notching doesnt explain why the radar doesnt detect things sometimes which very much arent notching. I will keep an eye out and get some clips.
I thought it did. Which sucks given we have no SRC mode to fall back upon for finding targets that TWS cannot see.
Save the ingame replays as well please.
I will do. I’ll save the gamelogs too
1 Like
Anyway. Any insider information regarding future plans for Aim-120C5 modeling?
or any other Typhoon tweaks coming this major?
Don’t know at the minute. Naturally if I hear anything I’m allowed to share I will do so in the appropriate forum thread.
2 Likes
Okaydokie, but let us know if your poking stick needs sharpening.
A lot of annoying little issues that they still havent resolved yet
Like the Aim-9M boresight being centred if the head is “at rest”
It shifts based upon positive or negative G being applied, its really annoying to have to adjust it down or up all the time
how come tws position reset hasnt been fixed yet
Just flew the EF again after flying american F-15/16/18 for the last month and holy hell… The notch gates don’t seem to be a problem at all but the extreme jumping around of target boxes, showing targets in your radar screen which you can’t select by cycling (even if they’re clearly not ghost targets which still get generated with a really high amount), forgetting target motion vectors the moment a target is lost (box flies into nirvana at an insane speed). It even seems to forget the target vectors sometimes if it has unobstructed view at a target.
The behavior differs extremly from the american radars as these seem to be much more “calm”, not generating as much ghost targets, not forgetting vectors or positions of targets they just scanned (hence the name Goldfish-M), etc. when following targets and getting the motion vectors correct on the first try without forgetting them.
Sometimes the Goldfish-M scans a target for the first time and detects a motion vector with a speed of around Mach 20 pulling your scan area to the border of the screen forcing you to reset it manually and let it scan again in hopes it gets it right this time. This also happens sometimes if a target gets just updated.
2 Likes
The american radars tend to update targets significantly faster than the CAPTOR-M, in all but the narrow scan, where the CAPTOR-M doesn’t actually really have a narrow scan so much as having quasi-STT mode pretending to be a narrow scan. Couple that with gaijins radar modelling not accounting for acceleration or flight vector at all and you end up with the radar constantly guessing wrong as to where its target is supposed to be.
