1 Like
Yeah… That would be how id have added 2x more AMRAAM, so the TMC is interesting.
So it’s at least the same case as the rafale, which is basically a testbed equivalent, but I don’t think we’ve ever seen the IP7 with dual AMRAAM racks
Bug report. German one has too much search zone should be 180x180 :P
4 Likes
let’s weak it
1 Like
watch CAPTOR-E be horrendously bugged somehow and not fixed for 8 months
Bug report #2: that radar model isnt even close to what ECRS should look like with a repositioner lol
1 Like
but itn looks like the UV-Filter got improvements in the green colour
But disappointed still saw SAL brismtone 1s. So I think we need to put our foot down and fight for SAL Brimstone 2s.
Also gunna see about ePaveway IIs as well, finally bring Britain fully onto par with the 2 nations in A2G
1 Like
Looks like the 1000lb Paveways on the British ECRS one, still aren’t dual-mode EPW-IIs
So we still don’t have the equivalent to the GBU-48 that Germany and Italy have even on the CAPTOR-M Eurofighter
1 Like
I hope this bug gets fixed before AESA arrives.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IhS8gSp6FFnK
200x200 scan zone in TWS?
As it is IRL. Good stuff.
funfact, the modell is scary close to the CAESAR radar and not the Captor
Probably won’t be the 200x200 fully, since it’s a rotating ESA Radar. I don’t know how they’ll model it for now tho.
The plate has to physically move from one side to the other for full coverage
I hope we get a 200x200 mode but would obviously be a lot slower scan rate
Uh, whatever.
I’ll give up anything for that sweet 100deg gimbal limit.
How slow would the 200x200 scan rate be?
The Su-30SM also has a similar mechanism, but it hasn’t been modeled yet. The Eurofighter will likely be modeled later as well.
In this case, you should keep constant lock on targets on the FOV of the plate, and slower scan on targets outside of the plate. Again, to be seen how they model it 🤷♂️