It should pull harder too right? I’ve heard that they are HOBS capable as far as AGMs go
Brimstone 2s dont have GNSS.
That is the Spear-3
1 Like
They dont have GNSS, brimstone 3 we have the data for. Its very very good IOG
1 Like
There is evidence that should be on the Brimstone 1 as well, but the increased thrust just makes it better on the Brimstone 2, so hopefully it would to a degree
1 Like
Fair enough. A previous post misled me. :)
Post amended with more correct information.
Brimstone 1/2 should only have an IOG drift of a few metres (been internally reported) and iirc Brimstone 3 has upgraded intertial navigation which could translate to so little IOG drift that it can be used a psuedo GPS. But the need for absolute accuracy could mean that even 1m IOG drift would be way too much to be usable in that regard
The inner AMRAAM pylon would be open to consideration if there was more information on it. So far however its just been computer generated images and drawings. No real evidence of the pylon currently.
2 Likes
Yes, I agree that the grounds for addition aren’t there yet; however my point is that if the devs had previously decided to overlook that and add it anyway, then that process of ‘freestyling’ additions so to speak, would join a list of other convenient additions which help the performance of a vehicle (eg. Dual R-77 pylons found on various flankers).
2 Likes
Unfortunate there was sufficient information for the R-77 dual pylons for them to be considered. That same level hasn’t yet been reached with the inner AMRAAM pylons.
The Eurofighters are generally performing better currently than the Flankers too on top of that.
1 Like
that being only installed on a completely different air frame, the su-35s? which also had the space between the engines widened to specifically accommodate the double rack?
It’s a double standard imo
13 Likes
Id just like to know when we are getting BOL.
as per the Thai Subtree devblog thing:
and this directly contradicts the current state of BOL and decision to change it 2 years ago. It is really really time for Gaijin to undo those fake changes and maybe even go as far as to implement BOL properly to the best the game can handle:
P.S
Can you forward this please
Community Bug Reporting System
3 Likes
Yep, those should just get removed.
1 Like
yeah uh, no we dont lmao
Double rack R77s, KH38MT, LMUR only AGM that lofts. Double standard is the new standard
7 Likes
Typhoon has plenty of customers.
Rafale also has plenty of customers.
If you were smart you would know that arms procurement is 75% Politics 25% capability.
Any nation that buys a Rafale, Typhoon or Gripen is getting a top level combat aircraft.
Rafale has the added strength in the export market of being a naval aircraft.
1 Like
1 Like
Where were you earlier…
Panda has been none stop on this thread
Outside :)
5 Likes
IF the Bundeswehr, RAF or the Italien Airforce would confirm that the Inner pylon is real and can be used for the AMRAAM, would that be enough?
I am Planing on writing an Mail to the BW for some stuff about the Eurofighter, I am pretty sure I could add an short question about the Inner pylon :)))))
Do you have a primary source that this exists?
Sounds like a Marketing lie to me
1 Like