massive issues with Ajax is accurate to real life, isnt it?
Yeah, but if a lot is going on, and I could just see a single band, its not always clear whether its the rMax or NEZ. Sure, context will probably say, but I kinda wish the B-Scope ranging UI was somewhere on the PPI display or if the 2 bands had differences, like the NEZ had a notch or something in it, so that you could tell it apart from the rMax. Especially notable with the ongoing C5 issue having NEZ larger than rMax still
Not in terms of armour and blow out pannels.
We are allowing the BMP-T to have laser accurate 30mms
fyi 2a42 has the exact same accuracy as bushmaster, GI30 etc in the files lol
3 Likes
That’s outrageous
One day they’ll remember about the BATTLE RATING feature that allows them to make vehicles historically accurate and then adjust their matchmaker to balance it, instead of the other way around.
2 Likes
Sounds like a Marketing lie
7 Likes
@Gunjob since you said you were unable to convince the devs, does that mean that this bug reported has been rejected: Community Bug Reporting System
wow so our radar went from top dog to worse the the new SU you say… man I love gaijin and their bias to nato sources… wonder why people hate them tbh
7 Likes
Coincidental i’m sure…
It’s really convenient that we got nerfed to 190deg/s to the Su-30SM2’s 195.
Funny that the SPICE can only be mounted on the Inboardwing Station in-game, you’re saying that’s because of the picture. But the picture in the source article shows it mounted on the Centerwing Station, where usually the external tanks are mounted.
Good Ol Marketing lie gaijin again
3 Likes
cant go an update without gaijin screwing over the Eurofighter or nato nations…
1 Like
Does anyone know the scan speed on the Su-30SM2? Depending on how fast it is, could it be possible to form a bug report based on it scanning its entire area using the e-scan speed and as a result, either it should be limited to its mechanical-only scan speed for all search patterns to match the typhoon or the typhoon should have the scan speed increased back up so that both are using e-scan speeds for all patterns? Preferably, both would have their scan speeds based on whether they needed to use mechanical slewing for that scan pattern or not, but since giving radars a single scan speed seems to be the norm, this was the best I could think of, given the time.
1 Like
This was for the proposal for the Eurofighter AK and SPICE 250 ER.
The report was actioned based on the sources that could be confirmed for the standard (Non AK program) Eurofighters
Spoiler
2 Likes
irl or in game?
Irbis on 30sm2 doesn’t have any search zones where it uses its mechanical scan, only uses e scan.
Same with bars on su-30sm, gaijin limits its search zones to its e scan limits
I believe it actually scans slower than the Rafales AESA
Has anyone compared it to the Su-34s PESA…Probably the level Gaijin were going for.
Because how could little old Europe build a Radar that is as good as Russias…
1 Like
Not quite. Rafale’s AESA sits even lower, which is even funnier considering it’s shorter range and then logically would need less dwell time allowing it to scan faster…