Is it just me or is the BK27 pretty inaccurate?
Compared to Vulcan: Vulcan goes from Shotgun to Laser
Technically the fastest scanning radar in the game is the AI Mk.X at 900°/s, but that’s hardly a fair comparison I know. So yeah the Su-30 has the fastest scanning useful radar.
1 Like
That is 100% gunna brick them for at least a few weeks after hitting live. I would nearly bet money on it.
Though even without, even if we just get an AESA locked forward. Its still a massive win
What im hoping is that there might be a mode that is that large (200 wide) but its the gimball moving left and right. So would be a lot slower than if it was just in a 70 wide mode, but with massive scan volume. Useless in actual combat, but great for situational awarness and just a little easier than manually slewing the radar left and right
1 Like
Nice work. ASRAAM is 88.91 kg total mass (so 51.91 kg after burnout using Gaijin’s numbers), which would presumably make it a bit quicker than CAMM.
2 Likes
I can feel this picture. Feel how ±100 in VERTICAL angles is gonna be insane QOL step up.
Something still isnt right with the Aim-120C5 LSZs
How can the LSZ be larger than the rMax?
Also happens with any missile really at high altitude
This wasnt that high, the target was actually low and I was only at about 10k ft.
But seems to happen with C5s more than any other, in fact, I dont recall ever seeing it on the Aim-120B on any platform
Yep, i tried it first with ASRAAM data, but i changed because idk how different will be the drag coefficient. I looked into AIM-9C vs 9D, R-24R vs 24T, R-27T vs 27R and didnt find a standard, 9C vs 9D had no difference in the coefficient, but 27R vs 27T had a big one…
Could it be the minimum range mark (for whatever reason), and the max range one is just so far off that it didnt fit within HUD?
I mean I dont know for sure, but that would explain a lot.
I would check on 148km scope scale to verify.
no you can see that at the very bottom of the range scale
No definetly the rMax, you can see the rMin at the bottom. Get it all the time. The LSZ being bigger than the rMax
Oh, that…
Yeah thats messed up.
i think thats due to gaijin not actively calculating that stuff on the go, but rather have a pre made value sheet that the game refrences
I’ve had this for a while, this was a while ago but I somehow dont think the Aim-120C5 has a bigger LSZ than a METEOR
1 Like
Probably, its why Skyflash STs dont have LSZ yet on the F3. Its done on a missile by missile basis, but its pretty clear that something is very wrong with C5s
because both seekers are round
because one is round and one is pointy (like ASRAAM and CAMM)
What Are the scan sizes of TWS for captor e?
copy pasted from the Captor-M knowing gaijin
