#German_EF_for_the_Win
#except_for_skins
Ah, but need that LWR 😜
Eh, just an Gimmick…
Nah, did actually save me from a ka52 in a GSB match before
It is as half the things that target you dont set it off.
Gaijin thinks passive tracking systems like those found on the 2S38 use no kind of ranging laser.
They just know the range…
1 Like
Yeah, and then Gaijin questions typhoon being able to do the same with IRST for guiding AMRAAM 🤣
7 Likes
With the result:
Currently not Possibly to code, maybe in the future :/
honestly, is see asraam being good in the SIM, but why should i ever use asraam in ARB when i can use the AMRAAMs or even in the future meteor.
I would rather have dogfight missles as alternative
1 Like
Clear Marketing lie
3 Likes
Ngl, I can’t wait for the IIR generation to come because of the sheer amount of arguing that will happen when someone’s missile is mismodeled or worse than the other missiles. The amount of chaos will be glorious.
1 Like
ASRAAM still has an notable advantage over MICA in terms of speed / time to target. Also seeker gimbal limits and track rate are better than MICA IR (not that track rate matters too much in game).
3 Likes
If you can maintain any range, then youll have your answer. ASRAAMs sheer speed will make defending even harder as you will have little time to react and the lack of RWR warning means you ll not a see a typhoon coming without your own eyes.
I can see it being a very potent third partier and whilst sure iris-T will do better in ultra close quarters, ASRAAM is no slouch either
Range is entirely dependent on how they choose to model the seekers, both could be equally limited in terms of max lock ranges (especially if no LOAL is modeled) at which point ASRAAMs speed wins and the maneuverability is equal past point blank range.
The better question is how both will fair with Flare resistance at ranges where that advantage would actually matter
It’s also worth mentioning that ASRAAM is the only one that isn’t TVC, and we all know the issues with TVC
I’ve never actually seen track rate or gimbal limit numbers for ASRAAM. As for MICA, I know its gimbal limits are ±60 deg, sort of assumed ASRAAM was the same?
ASRAAM is 90
Ok, that’s a great claim, would it kill you to provide a source for it though? Thats kind of what I was asking for there, seeing as the french were saying the MICA’s gimbal limit was ±120deg when it was actually ±60deg (120deg total).
I dont think the ASRAAM only has 45deg gimbal limits (pretty sure that’s what it has using its analogue bus), but I haven’t actually seen any info stating it has ±90 deg gimbal limits yet, which is what I’m actually curious about.
Nope.
At least i dont think i have any at hand at the current moment.
Flame looks to have the necessary sources
Ty, looks like the MICA IR is lagging hard in that regard then.
Edit: @DevilO6 why remove your comment?