Has agm88 harm also been fitted?
I mean pictures of the missile on the plane
I havent seen any :(
Typhoon never seems to fly with anything interesting
a few small problems
the Captor isnt able to fire fox-1 missiles
so it cant fire the aspide or sky flash
that same picture also shows that the Ef can only carry 6 brimstones
that video is about the su30 simulator, thats the source i had on hand but
there are multiple pictures where you can see it carry r-77s on different pylons
including this hud picture ( you can see the currently selected weapon and the pylons it is mounted on)
There is thia graphic too. I understand what you are saying.
Unfortunately for Typhoon players any sources we have are classified.
And because of how Typhoon operates it doesnt need to carry 12 missiles.
It’s frustrating though when we want to use the sim footage to show how much Typhoon is underperforming in acceleration etc. And it is not a valid source
Yet we have Russian news channel showing off the Su-30 and sim footage and it’s all good.
My point does remain Su-30s are never seen carrying more than 8 missiles (majority R-27s)
I know i have been in here since Storm warning dev server
i have made a few bug-reports on the typhoon#
if it werent for me the EF wouldnt have properly working hud and hmd symbology in sim
the thing is that video was used by me, to show a possible loadout on the su30 not to change the FM
i never said gaijin used that as a source, it is what i had on hand
EF is mostly seen with a 2+2 loadout
“mostly” still means it has been seen with more
You have yet to show of a real life picture of a SU-30 with 8 missles simultaneously apparantly
While we showed documents that have the same level as yours but here we are, Russian SU 30 getting prefered treatment
1 Like
iam to tiered with arguing with you guys
I KNOW THE EF CAN CARRY MORE MISSILES
THE SU30 DOSNET HAVE IT’S MISSILE COUNT BECAUSE OF BUG REPORTS BUT BECAUSE GAIJIN GAVE IT THAT MUCH
the pic i provided was the first source i had on hand, lets all just ignore the picture of a hud i also posted
no they dont, they are made by third parties and arent a picture of the loadout selection of the EF simulator at AIrbus
and you have yet to show a picture of the EF with amraams on the inner wing pylon
arguing with you is so annoying, at the slightest sight of sombody showing something russian you guys get hostile for no reason at all and start going on about double standars and prefered treatment
i know it is annoying but crying about it on here isnt going anywhere and you gotta live with it,
because guess what life is not fair
That’ll be because HARM hasn’t been integrated yet.
1 Like
There are lots of declassified Eurofighter documents from the National Archives, unfortunately they all support the idea that AAMs cannot be carried on the inner wing pylons.
1 Like
Is it a structural limitation? Can Typhoon carry dual ASRAAM on the inner wing pylons?
That was sth that AMK stated , the ability to carry heavier loads
No the current placement of SRAAM on Typhoon is correct, as is the MRAAM load.
2 Likes
Has any operator equipped Taurus/storm shadow on the inner wing pylons? It seems to be only 2nd to the inner wing pylons?
Also can hope/HOSBO be equipped in all pylons like all the other bombs?
2 Likes
Yeah, it’s just a standard bomb shackle
1 Like
Isn’t the Taurus on the inner pylon not possible because of the landing gear?
Did they ever make smaller versions of them, because the Hope weighs 1400kg and the Hosbo 900kg, which i think means they can only go on the Taurus/2000lb Pylon, so we’d get 2.
If it would be like that i’d rather they just give us the Taurus to use with just the terminal infrared seeker, kind of like the Hammer.
Edit: There is a mk82 body hosbo, which means it could be carried on all bomb pylons.