The second source is not a pilot interview…it’s a clarification from the journalist that wrote the article.
The two pilot interviews are just corroboration that…no…the current Eurofighter is not good at fighting at high angles of attack.
The one in game can safely reach 50 AOA.
I have all top tier jets and i agree with @MotorolaCRO in this case.
I would like to hear your excuse for me.
Nothing you show states the Eurofighters AoA it just states that at low speed a F/A-18s is better and that aN Eurofighter would never be slow
Its just not a good argument you are making and combined with they way you arew acting it is pointless to continue this further
The 2nd screenshot I posted it and it’s from a reputable journalist who interviewed one of the test pilots. Eurofighter being limited in AoA is something that is fairly well known.
Do you have any solid proof that shows EFT should be really good at high angle attacks with those canards?
Rafale and Gripen uses close coupled canards for high angle attacks while EFT uses opposite one but according to you EFT should be able to perform at same degree that Rafale and Gripen can.
Ah, so you will dodge the question of how EFT w/F&F makes Su-34 ‘irrelevant’ when nothing else has.
Good to know your stance here is “I just don’t want EFT nations to have F&F” then.
Don’t put words into my mouth
Then explain properly.
Last I checked, the F-18 can achieve AoA of 70 degrees, neither Rafale, nor Gripen, nor EFT can, so the screenshots posted here don’t prove that EFT itself cannot achieve “high AoA”, just that F-18s AoA will in the end be higher. The rest is confirmation bias.
So is the Eurofighter accurate in-game, last I checked it should stall when achieving AOA that would cause total flow separation
The only time(s) it achieves “obscene AoA” is when you put it in a total vertical when its clean, so its TWR handles it more than you are (and WTIRT tells you it pulls 50 AoA cus of that), in a horizontal turn the most I’ve achieved has been 35 so do leave your bias behind.
Thats true but it also doesnt prove that EFT should be able to reach higher AOA compare to Gripen and Rafale.
So im still waiting for an answer my question, how come EFT can achieve higher aoa than Rafale and Gripen in this game even tho it doesnt have same design philosophy?
Okay, simple question:
Does anybody here know the “AoA limits” of any of them? I’ve been in contact with people who are handling EFTs bug reports (i.e Fireball & Flame) and neither of them knows the limits, and I doubt you or MiG-23M know either (especially for the EFT and Gripen, the latter of which is a complete guesswork as far as I am aware), so arguments based on “It can’t cus I say so” are non-arguments. The only point of comparison here is the F/A-18, which if modelled properly will always have higher AoA than the EFT, the dev server or the live server one, doesn’t matter.
In that case its safe to say current EFT should be not able to reach those AOA considering no one has solid proof.
So basically what you’re claiming is also based on nothing.
I didn’t say that, nor do I advise against saying that, my point is that these arguments are goddamn worthless because it’s word of mouth against words of mouth from both you and others, whether you for or against. I didn’t even claim that it “should” be able to do these, just what I’ve been able to achieve with my EFT in extreme situations.
So basically its pointless to claim that what EFT can do or not.
In this case some people who defends EFT’s capabilities endlessly are just people who worship this plane.
Took you a while. Fireball and Flame also don’t like sharing what they have on the EFT as well, so before they do, we will simply not know.
In this case some people who defends EFT’s capabilities endlessly are just people who worship this plane.
When you look at it from a different angle, this is the exact same as M1 Abroomz glazers claiming it should have X% improved armor based on circumstantial evidence ;)
There he is, you cant stop yourself can you.
At least they have some circumstantial evidence, in EFT case we dont even have something that is remotely close to this.
Get a clue. This is (edit) friendly banter.
I know but i thought you and i were over this.
Remember, im not here to fight with you, im just here to discuss with you to learn something new.