i deleted the comment at that point because i noticed he answered to another comment xD
1 Like
in stock from their av-8b+
its not their main missle, but they did have them in stock
1 Like
Community Bug Reporting System - this 100% proofs, that EF can use amraam or another missles in inner pylon. And without secret doc.
ALDERU+MFRL = absolutely same outer pylon where missiles already available
2 Likes
That’s the neat part, I have not really seen anyone talk about this apart from my own rambles, lol.
Iam thinking about starting new bug report. I would like to use F-15C non-nuclear weapon delivery manual but i have no idea if i can use manual from 79 with 81 revision as there is nowhere to be seen unrestricted/unclassified but there is no restricted or classified either.
Send the front page to a tech mod and ask them if it is fine to use.
What do you want to report?
Wrong bars, again. Because it looks like it wont get solved with one report. 1F-15C-34-1-1 has nice illustration of scan so i can attach direct manual evidence and then copy paste video you found. Scan pattern is not usual in old manuals like on phantoms. Its all in more modern ones, usually classified or restricted. Typhoon manual has amazing illustrations of pattern AND priority target track but it cant be used on forum.
IMHO It’s quite simple.
I don’t think anyone is disputing that German Eurofighters carry/carried AIM-9L/I-1 right? So that’s not even up for debate.
The Devs stated that the RB74(M) that the swedish Gripen has is meant to be the AIM-9L/I-1 right?
So the German Eurofighter should get excatly that missile copy-paste as the AIM-9L/I-1.
If they want to revisit if that missile has a smokeless motor later on, fine. But for now germany should get that copy-paste for the Eurofighter.
5 Likes
That makes too much sense, now it can’t be added.
I think there were already reports on F-15’s scan patterns on the community bug reporting platform (from when it was added and had a bunch of this wrong about it). It is just that one bug screwed most planes over.
In my report I attached the MiG-29s manual as an example and a cockpit recording of F-16’s test flight with the radar scope.
If you can’t find any sources in old bug reports and can’t use the manual, you might find that info in videos or research papers, if you are lucky (that is how I nerfed F-16’s scan speed, lol)
Yeah i disagree with German eurofighter not getting at least the option of the Li-1 even if it were to be a mod.
4 Likes
“Not a bug”…
Maby if you ping gunjob to forward it bc the bug reporting moderators are sometimes not the brightest ones
1 Like
What’s the plane in the picture?
Spoiler
UPD: NVM, F-16
Has anyone actually asked the manufacturer about this?
I don’t know if they’ll answer but might be worth a try?
that was gunjob, we got him to look at it.
and he is right since its still only theoretical prove and only a mock up
but he wants to try asking the RAF himself after holidays
1 Like
I could try asking Airbus / Bundeswehr / Eurofighter GmbH about it
would propably leave it to him.
devs would trust mails from him more then ours, on other occasions ours where already declined
Besides that those 2 missles wont cost us the world. EFTs do only fly in the way it gets it currently.
And its not like the EFT becomes 1000 worse because its lacking those 2 missles
It is a nice thing to have, but not a necesarity
2 Likes