Has it happened AGAIN!?!??!?!??
No leak yet
i mean look at this and then look at the screenshot
1 Like
Hello again Big reports is once again a typo
Although who knows part of the Su-33 features(At a glance now) was “LARGE!”
1 Like
And how am I supposed to know about this?
boring comment, wont like
1 Like
I warned you guys that the EJ200 is not suited for supercruise already
welcome to checking multiple sources and reading through to see if anywhere in it says classified
Currently impossible.
Maximum mach number without after burner is mach 1.2-1.3 clean at 11,000m
We have to wait for the updated FM on dev server before we make more assumptions
Lol. One more gaijin genius. In another game not problem with it. They just not say.
1 Like
Dont you try to shit on the Eurofighter in every possible situation anyway?
13 Likes
You know what supercruise is right? like most modern fighter jets in service can do this easily
Gonna need some help on this one please
That’s the vibe you got from shiny and others because I dare questioned your Gods’ abilities, sure. Call me the voice of reason I guess.
I am quite well aware, the EJ200 engine is not as well suited to it as the Rafale’s M88 and certainly less than the F119
You already created multiple reports today with excerpts from this restricted manual.
You should have clearly read the rules before just uploading what you find online. Something being “freely available” does not make it legal.
5 Likes
go ahead and provide your sources if you will
1 Like
14 Likes
I did in the UK thread, I’m on my phone currently. Public Eurofighter documentation shows higher bypass ratio of 0.4, optimized for fuel consumption dry at 0.9 mach and wet optimal at 1.8 mach. Pressure ratio is limited as a function of turbine inlet temp and thus exhaust velocity is insufficient for high speed supercruise.
Additionally, with a higher bypass ratio the excess thrust needed to accelerate the exhaust velocity after mixing with the bypass air causes worsened SFC the faster you go into supercruise.