looks kinda photshopped to me, not to mention there isnt even a pylon on the other side of the wing
Because it is.
the entire report was supposed to fail because it also uses pictures from an Tornado
Zusammenfassung
i find it funny that grippen e still can carry more meteors than eurofighter
Gaijin doesn’t take diagrams from official sources
Eurofighter GMBH had a few renders with Meteors on nearly all pylons, I don’t doubt they could make it happen, just doesn’t seem to be any interest from EFT customers for bigger A2A missile loads.
1 Like
Just need to contact Eurofighter operators to show an image of a mfrl launcher on those pylons
time to write them and ask for an 2+8 loudout picture xD (including an paycheck) xD
i think they could if a customer wanted to, but i dont think that you would ever need 16 or so meteors each costing around 1 million euros on a plane at once
Yep this one
Spoiler
3 Likes
Damn, was surfing on the Eurofighter page, they even mention an Lightning V pod
Yeah the RAF use those. I don’t think anyone else has purchased them yet.
Lmao…
The EF page is fake/Broken xD
And the entire message is gone, REEEEEE
Now…
Just to play Devils advocate but we have never seen a Su-30SM with 14 missiles.
The manual is obviously going to be classified so we go on what…drawings and Russian doctrine…
We all know that Typhoon could go full beast mode
But with the efficacy of Meteors and the fuel penalties…why bother
2 Likes
I want
we all know it shouldnt have the double pylons
but that is how gaijin wants to incentevise ppl to grind the su30
but 12 missiles are very much a thing
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9Rmw9hMaJ83E
Sorry for the ping but is there any news about what the devs planing to do about this bug report it says “response needed” but there is nothing to add or to respond to, i was told skin change is the only option bc the ingame EFT must be a T2 B10 (which is weird since it’s highly time consuming and even if they want to add/introduce a T3A in the future it will most likely sever no purpose since T3A and T2 are identical in almost all aspects except for some minor things, plus a T2 can get all the upgrades it need through the PE program putting it on the same lvl of T3A and if not even making it more advance than early T3A that didn’t get the PEs).
Further more Germany plans to retrofitted thier T2s and T3s with ECRS Mk 1 in the near future which as i stated earlier make the T2 again on the same lvl of any T3, so again why don’t the devs just take the easy way and change the name to “Eurofighter T3A”?
(Spain flies new E-Scan radar for Eurofighter)
(https://aviationweek.com/defense/sensors-electronic-warfare/germany-first-modernize-eurofighters-aesa-radar)
